Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Evaluation of herbal blended roxburgh fig (Ficus auriculata Lour.) wine for quality and storage stability

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13183
Submitted
12 December 2025
Published
21-04-2026

Abstract

Roxburgh fig (Ficus auriculata Lour.), an underutilised fruit species native to Asia, possesses high nutritional value and bioactive compounds, offering significant health benefits. Despite the recognised nutritional and medicinal value of F. auriculata, there is limited scientific evidence on its utilization for standardised wine production, particularly in combination with functional herbal extracts. Hence, the study aims to utilize Roxburgh fig to produce wine enriched with leaf extracts of gotu kola (Centella asiatica (L.) Urb.) and vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty) root extracts and to optimise fermentation parameters, as well as to develop pilot-scale production technology. The study was conducted using eight different concentrations of herbal blends (2, 4, 6 and 8 % of gotu kola and vetiver) along with a control (fruit pulp). During the standardisation of herbal blended wine, T2 and T6 (2 % gotu kola and vetiver extract, respectively) resulted in significantly high alcohol (9.08-9.12 %) and lower reducing sugar content (6.91-6.93 mg/mL). It was comparable with the control (9.28 % alcohol and 6.40 mg mL-1 reducing sugar). However, the highest overall acceptability score (4.1) was obtained in T2 (fruit pulp with 2 % gotu kola leaf extract). Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MTCC 178) culture at a 3 % concentration, with a pH level of 4.5 and a temperature of 30 °C, was found to be optimum for maximum alcohol production, resulting in higher sensory evaluation scores. This study demonstrates that roxburgh fig, combined with moderate concentrations of herbal extracts, can produce high-quality, sensory-appealing wine.

References

  1. 1. Shrestha S, Bohara M, Khadayat K, Limbu A, Basnyat RC, Poudel R. Nutritional analysis and phytochemical determination of fruits of Ficus auriculata. Food Humanity. 2023;1:370–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2023.06.014
  2. 2. Bhatt SC, Kumar V, Naik B, Gupta AK, Saris PEJ, Kumar V, et al. Ficus auriculata Lour., an underutilized nonconventional alternative fruit to Ficus carica with nutraceutical potential. Discov Sustain. 2024;5(1):254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00480-3
  3. 3. Tamta G, Mehra N, Tandon S. Traditional uses, phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Ficus auriculata: A review. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2021;11(3):163–9. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i3.4853
  4. 4. Rathi V. Herbal wine: A review. Adv Weight Loss Manag Med Dev. 2018;3(2). https://doi.org/10.35248/2593-9793.18.3.113
  5. 5. Kumar A, Dogra S, Prakash A. Neuroprotective effects of Centella asiatica against intracerebroventricular colchicine-induced cognitive impairment and oxidative stress. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;2009:972178. https://doi.org/10.4061/2009/972178
  6. 6. Orhan IE. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban: From traditional medicine to modern medicine with neuroprotective potential. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:946259. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/946259
  7. 7. Chandrika UG, Prasad Kumarab PAAS. Gotu kola (Centella asiatica): Nutritional properties and plausible health benefits. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2015;76:125–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2015.08.001
  8. 8. Sabaragamuwa R, Perera CO, Fedrizzi B. Centella asiatica (Gotu kola) as a neuroprotectant and its potential role in healthy ageing. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;79:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.024
  9. 9. Pittella F, Dutra RC, Junior DD, Lopes MTP, Barbosa NR. Antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(9):3713–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10093713
  10. 10. Lunz K, Stappen I. Back to the roots-an overview of the chemical composition and bioactivity of selected root-essential oils. Molecules. 2021;26(11):3155. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113155
  11. 11. Sharma Y. Cultivation of vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty)-A versatile medicinal and aromatic plant. Eur J Med Plants. 2024;35(5):16–22. https://doi.org/10.9734/ejmp/2024/v35i51199
  12. 12. David A, Fărcaș A, Socaci SA. An overview of the chemical composition and bioactivities of Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash essential oil. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;140:104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104153
  13. 13. Caputi A Jr, Ueda M, Brown T. Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol in wine. Am J Enol Vitic. 1968;19(3):160–5. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1968.19.3.160
  14. 14. Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger principles of biochemistry. New York: Macmillan; 2008.
  15. 15. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31(3):426–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  16. 16. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control of fruit and vegetable products. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited; 1986.
  17. 17. Singleton VL, Rossi JA Jr. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16(3):144–58. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144
  18. 18. Wichchukit S, O’Mahony M. The 9-point hedonic scale and hedonic ranking in food science: Some reappraisals and alternatives. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(11):2167–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6993
  19. 19. Panse VS, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: ICAR; 1985.
  20. 20. Bely M, Stoeckle P, Masneuf-Pomarède I, Dubourdieu D. Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii-Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;122(3):312–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.023
  21. 21. Singh RS, Kaur P. Evaluation of litchi juice concentrate for the production of wine. Nat Prod Radiance. 2009;8(4):386–91.
  22. 22. Jagtap NS, Khadabadi SS, Ghorpade DS, Banarase NB, Naphade SS. Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban, Umbelliferae. Res J Pharm Technol. 2009;2(2):328–30.
  23. 23. Chauhan H, Kaul RK, Ahmed N, Gupta P, Anjum A. Preparation and evaluation of bael (Aegle marmelos) vermouth. Int J Food Ferment Technol. 2016;6(1):41. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-9396.2016.00025.8
  24. 24. Paul SK, Sahu JK. Process optimization and quality analysis of carambola (Averrhoa carambola L.) wine. Int J Food Eng. 2014;10(3):457–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2012-0125
  25. 25. Panesar PS, Panesar R, Singh B. Application of response surface methodology in optimization of process parameters for production of kinnow wine. Nat Prod Radiance. 2009;8:366–73.
  26. 26. Togarepi E. Optimization of fermentation parameters for ethanol production from Ziziphus mauritiana fruit pulp using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NA33). Int J Biochem Res Rev. 2012;2(2):60–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJBCRR/2012/1096
  27. 27. Fleet GH. Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;86(1–2):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00245-9
  28. 28. Mathewson WS. The manual for the home and farm production of alcohol fuel. Berkeley (CA): Ten Speed Press; 1980. p.1–228.
  29. 29. Singh M, Panesar P, Marwaha SS. Studies on the suitability of kinnow fruits for the production of wine. J Food Sci Technol. 1998;35:455–7.
  30. 30. Veloso IIK, Rodrigues KCS, Sonego JLS, Cruz AJG, Badino AC. Fed-batch ethanol fermentation at low temperature as a way to obtain highly concentrated alcoholic wines: Modeling and optimization. Biochem Eng J. 2019;141:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.10.005
  31. 31. Sharma N, Bhutia SP, Aradhya D. Process optimization for fermentation of wine from jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.). J Food Process Technol. 2012;4(2):1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000204
  32. 32. Wang NS. Biochemical engineering laboratory manual: Wine fermentation. United States: University of Maryland; 2009.
  33. 33. Nandagopal G, Nair PS. Production of wine from ginger and Indian gooseberry and a comparative study over commercial wine. Am J Eng Res. 2013;2(5):19–38.
  34. 34. Mendes-Ferreira A, Mendes-Faia A, Leão C. Growth and fermentation patterns of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different ammonium concentrations and its implications in winemaking industry. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(3):540–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02331.x
  35. 35. Kulkarni JH, Singh H, Chadha KL. Preliminary screening of mango variety for wine making. J Food Sci Technol. 1980;17:218–20.
  36. 36. Romano P, Capece A, Jespersen L. Taxonomic and ecological diversity of food and beverage yeasts. In: Yeasts in food and beverages. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p.13–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28398-0_2
  37. 37. Vignault A, Gombau J, Jourdes M, Moine V, Canals JM, Fermaud M, et al. Oenological tannins to prevent Botrytis cinerea damage in grapes and musts: Kinetics and electrophoresis characterization of laccase. Food Chem. 2020;316:126334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126334
  38. 38. Vignault A, Gombau J, Pascual O, Jourdes M, Moine V, Canals JM, et al. Copigmentation of malvidin-3-O-monoglucoside by oenological tannins: Incidence on wine model color in function of botanical origin, pH and ethanol content. Molecules. 2019;24(8):1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081448
  39. 39. Katalinić V, Milos M, Modun D, Musić I, Boban M. Antioxidant effectiveness of selected wines in comparison with (+)-catechin. Food Chem. 2004;84(4):593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.10.007
  40. 40. Attri BL, Lal BB, Joshi VK. Technology for the preparation of sand pear vermouth. Indian Food Packer. 1994;48:39–43.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.