Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

The Hyperlocal data documentation for farmer empowerment through phygital services

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13519
Submitted
3 January 2026
Published
08-04-2026

Abstract

The study explores the documentation and utilisation of hyperlocal agricultural data through the mobile agri support services (MASS) initiative implemented in 2024 in 3 aspirational districts of Telangana viz., Kumuram Bheem Asifabad, Jayashankar Bhupalpally, Khumuram and Bhadradri Kothagudem. The initiative integrates physical and digital (phygital) approaches to enhance the accessibility, precision and timeliness of agricultural services for smallholder farmers. A total of 1000 farmers were surveyed using participatory rural appraisal (PRA) techniques, focus group discussions (FGDs) and structured interviews to assess socio-economic profiles, constraints and technology adoption patterns. This study analysed hyperlocal agricultural data from 6 villages in 3 aspirational districts of Telangana covering 1465 households and 1418 farmers cultivating 150.3–385.4 ha per village with limited irrigation (10.2–200.3 ha). Paddy, cotton and red gram were the major crops, with borewells as the main irrigation source and no marketing facilities. The FGDs revealed that 83–100 % of farmers faced high input costs, price fluctuations, weak extension services, limited technology access and allied sector constraints, while socio-economic data showed predominance of middle-aged, marginal, low-income farmers with high dependence on moneylenders and low access to agro-advisories, indicating significant structural and institutional gaps. The study concludes that hyperlocal data, when integrated within a phygital extension framework, enables need-based advisories, efficient resource utilisation and inclusive service delivery. The MASS model demonstrates a scalable approach to strengthening agricultural extension, fostering farmer empowerment, institutional innovation and profitability through real-time, localised data-driven interventions.

References

  1. 1. FAO. Digital agriculture: Linking farmers to data-driven extension systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  2. 2. Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Change. 1985;33(2):255–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/451461
  3. 3. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
  4. 4. Anderson JR, Feder G. Agricultural extension. In: Evenson RE, Pingali P, editors. Handbook of agricultural economics. Vol 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 2343–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1
  5. 5. Glendenning CJ, Babu SC, Asenso-Okyere K. Review of agricultural extension in India. IFPRI Discuss Pap. 2010;01048.
  6. 6. Birner R, Davis K, Pender J, Nkonya E, Anandajayasekeram P, Ekboir J, et al. From best practice to best fit: a framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services. J Agric Educ Ext. 2009;15(4):341–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240903309595
  7. 7. National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). Situation assessment of agricultural households in India. New Delhi: Government of India; 2019.
  8. 8. Meera SN, Jhamtani A, Singh N. ICTs in agricultural extension: the Indian experience. J Ext Syst. 2020;36:1–17.
  9. 9. Aker JC. Dial “A” for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agric Econ. 2011;42(6):631–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x
  10. 10. Birthal PS, Roy D, Negi DS. Assessing the impact of farmer producer organizations on farm performance. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2019;32(1):1–15.
  11. 11. Singh S. New markets for smallholders in India: exclusion, policy and mechanisms. Econ Polit Wkly. 2012;47(52):95–105.
  12. 12. World Bank. Transforming Indian agriculture for jobs and growth. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2020.
  13. 13. Binswanger HP, Khandker SR. The impact of formal finance on the rural economy of India. J Dev Stud. 1995;32(2):234–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422413
  14. 14. NABARD. Status of microfinance in India. Mumbai: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; 2022.
  15. 15. PJTSAU. Annual report on digital extension initiatives. Hyderabad; 2023.
  16. 16. MANAGE. Innovative extension approaches in India. Hyderabad: National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management; 2022.
  17. 17. Gebbers R, Adamchuk VI. Precision agriculture and food security. Science. 2010;327(5967):828–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183899

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.