Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024)

Phytosociological study of a Grassland community of Baripada, Mayurbhanj district of Odisha, India: Conservation strategies for floristic diversity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3691
Submitted
10 April 2024
Published
14-07-2024 — Updated on 16-07-2024
Versions

Abstract

A phytosociological study of the grassland community at Maharaja Purna Chandra Autonomous College (21 º 93’ N; 86 º 76' E) was conducted from July 2022 to July 2023. The study aimed to understand the floristic diversity and propose conservation strategies. A rigorous data collection methodology was implemented using 1 m × 1 m quadrat sampling, and the findings were analyzed and presented using a novel approach. Parameters such as occurrence (+) and non-occurrence (-) of species, frequency, density, abundance, basal area, basal cover, and Important Value Index (IVI) were recorded for 36 species (18 grasses and 18 non-grasses) throughout the research period. The study revealed that certain species, including Chrysopogon acciculatus and Evolvulus nummularius, exhibited high frequency, density, abundance and IVI throughout the research period. Conversely, Eragrostis unioloides and Sida cordifolia showed the lowest IVI during the study. Basal area and basal cover data indicated an inverse relationship between grasses and non-grasses. The total Relative Frequency (RF), Relative Density (RD), and Relative Dominance (RDo.) of the community were consistently around 100 for each month, and the total IVI values were approximately 300 each month. These results underscore the need for effective conservation strategies to preserve the unique floristic diversity of this grassland community. The remarkable phytosociological attributes of this experimental grassland community may be attributed to the topography, soil composition, and climatic conditions of the locality.

References

  1. Golley FB. Structure and function of an old-field Broom sedge community. Ecol. Monogr. 1965; 35(1):113-137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942219
  2. Misra MK, Misra BN. Species diversity and dominance in a grassland community. Folio Geobot. Et Phytotaxo. 1981; 16:309-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851900
  3. Verma M, Niranjan R, Pal A. Phytosociological attributes of a tropical dry deciduous forest of Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh, India. Environmental science. 2013.
  4. Sinha A, Rana RS, Gupta SR. Phytosociological analysis of some natural grassland communities of sodic soils. Tropical Ecology. 1988; 29 (2): 136-145.
  5. Rout SD, Panda SK, Panda T. Phytosociological and floristic evaluation of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha, India. Tropical Plant Research. 2018; 5(3): 419–430. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpr.2018.v5.i3.051
  6. Behera, RK. Community structure, primary production and energetics of a grassland community of Boudh-Khandamals (Dist.-Phulbani) in Orissa, Ph.D. Thesis, Berhampur University, Berhampur, Orissa. 1994.
  7. Pandey DD, Pandey K, Kumar SS. Phytosociological studies of grasslands in the vicinity of Pataratu thermal power, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. Journal of Phytology. 2011; 3(12): 63-66.
  8. Ganaie MM, Reshi ZA. Species Diversity and Dominance Pattern in a temperate Grassland of Kashmir Himalaya. Journal of Plant Science and Research. 2021.
  9. Symonides E. Floristic richness, diversity, dominance and species evenness in old-field successional ecosystems. Ekologia Polska. 1985; 33(1): 61-79.
  10. Priede A. Phytosociological and dynamics of calcareous grasslands in Kemeri National Park, Latvia. Estonian Journal of Ecology. 2011; 60(4):284-304. https://doi.org/10.3176/eco.2011.4.03
  11. Yeo MJM, Blackstock TH, Stevens DP. The use of phytosociological data in conservation assessment: a case study of lowland grasslands in mid Wales. Biological Conservation. 1998; 86(2): 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00017-2
  12. Barik KL, Misra BN. Seasonal changes in the phytosociological attributes of an upland grassland community. Neo Botanica. 1996; 4 (2): 87-92.
  13. S Lavorel.Plant functional effects on ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology. 2013; 101(1): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12031
  14. Grime JP. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature. 1973; 242: 344–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/242344a0
  15. Tilman D, Downing JA. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature (London).1994; 367:363-365. https://doi.org/10.1038/367363a0
  16. Naeem S, Li S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature .1997; 390: 507-509. https://doi.org/10.1038/37348
  17. Diaz S, Cabido M. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2001; 16: 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2
  18. Bai Y, Cotrufo MF. Grassland soil carbon sequestration: Current understanding,challeneges, and solutions. Science.2022; 377(6606):603-608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo2380
  19. Boval M, Dixon RM. The importance of grasslands for animal production and other functions: a review on management and methodological progress in the tropics. Animal. 2012; 6(5):748-762. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000304
  20. Goodall DW. Quantitative aspects of plant distribution. Biol. Rev. 1952; 27(2): 194-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1952.tb01393.x
  21. Oosting HJ. The study of plant communities: an introduction to plant ecology. W.H. Freeman.1956.
  22. Misra R. Ecology Work Book. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp. 244. 1968.
  23. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phyto sociological characters. Ecology. 1950; 31:434-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497
  24. Cottam G, Curtis JT. The use of distance measures in phytosociology sampling. Ecology.1956; 37: 451–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167
  25. Nayak AK, Barik KL. Floristic Diversity of a Grassland Community of Baripada, Odisha, India. Eco. Env. & Cons. 2024; 30 (2): 495-499.
  26. Sahoo AK, Barik KL. Anthropogenic active grassland communities: Floral diversity and biological spectrum analysis in Odisha, Ecological frontiers. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.03.001
  27. Datar MN. Floristic diversity and effect of anthropogenic activities on human-dominated grasslands in subtropical regions of Peninsular India. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales. 2016; 4(1): 8-18. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(4)8-18
  28. Behera SK, Mishra MK. Floristic and structure of the herbaceous vegetation of four recovering forest stands in the Eastern Ghats of India. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2006; 15: 2263–2285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-8215-7
  29. Gupta SR, Misra GP. Relationship between phytosociological attributes and above ground biomass in a grassland community. Geobios. 1978; 5: 105 - 107.
  30. Singh UN, Ambasht RS. Floristic composition and phytosociological analysis of three grass stands in Naugarh forest of Varanasi Division. Ind.J. For.1980; 3(2):143 -147.
  31. Ambasht RS, Pandey TN. Seasonal changes in the phytosociological and productive structure of two strands of Aristida cyanantha. Geo. Ecol.1981; 5 (1): 45 - 56.
  32. Naik BK. Phytosociology and primary production of a natural grassland community of Western Orissa. Ph.D.Thesis, Sambalpur University, Sambalpur, Orissa. 1985
  33. Borman MM, Krueger WC, Johnson DE. Growth patterns of perennial grasses in the Annual grassland type of South West Oregon. Agron.J. 1990; 82 (6): 1093 - 1098.
  34. Misra BN. Ecological studies on grassland community of South Orissa, Project report, Ministry of Environment, Gov. of India. 1992.
  35. Pradhan D. Primary production and phytosociology of a grassland community of Bhubaneswar. Ph.D. Thesis, Berhampur University, Berhampur, Orissa. 1994.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.