Energy efficiency and economic analysis of mechanized vs conventional cotton production system: A comparative study under rainfed vertisols of Tamil Nadu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4983Keywords:
cotton, mechanization, economics, energy, efficiencyAbstract
Energy efficiency plays a pivotal role in optimizing input use and improving the sustainability of agricultural practices, especially in energy-intensive crops like cotton. Due to its high economic importance, cotton cultivation has been in the need of the hour in developing mechanized cultivation practices aimed at improving production efficiency. This study evaluated energy consumption and performed an economic analysis of mechanized versus conventional cotton production under rainfed vertisols in Tamil Nadu. Among the various inputs, fertilizer application consumed the most energy in both systems, followed by labor energy differences between the 2 methods. Mechanized cultivation drastically reduced labor energy requirements (174.2 MJ/ha) compared to manual methods (2215.6 MJ/ha), highlighting the potential for labor savings. Mechanized cultivation also showed more efficient use of non-renewable energy sources, whereas conventional methods relied more on renewable energy inputs, highlighting the trade-offs between the 2 systems. Mechanized cultivation significantly reduced production costs (Rs. 74290/ha) compared to conventional methods (Rs. 140440/ha), largely due to a 47.8 % reduction in labor costs, demonstrating its economic viability. This study suggests that improving the energy efficiency of mechanized cotton production should prioritize efficient fertilizer use and reducing diesel fuel consumption through enhanced machinery performance.
Downloads
References
Govindarajan K, Gunasekar JJ, Subramanian P, Sampathrajan A. Energy consumption scenario for Kar paddy in high rainfall zone of Tamil Nadu. Madras Agric J. 2002;89 (Jan-Mar):1. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.A00168
Gunasekaran M, Premalatha N, Kumar M, Mahalingam L, Sakthivel N, Senguttuvan K, et al. Cotton CO17—a short duration, high yielding compact variety suitable for high density planting system. Electron J Plant Breed. 2020;11(4):993-1000. https://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1104.162
Kamaraj P, Kathirvel K. Development and evaluation of tractor operated belt type cotton planter. J Agric Eng. 2008;45(1):69-72. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2008451.1316
Kaur R, Chhina GS, Kaur M, Bhatt R, Elhindi KM, Mattar MA. Optimizing nutrient and energy efficiency in a direct-seeded rice production system: A Northwestern Punjab case study. Agronomy. 2024;14(4):671. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040671
Maheswari MU, Krishnasamy SM, Kumar M, Sakthivel N. Energy efficiency analysis of machine sown cotton under high density planting system. Res Crops. 2019;20(2):430-37. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2019.062
Adeyemo AJ, Akingbola OO, Ojeniyi SO. Effects of poultry manure on soil infiltration, organic matter contents and maize performance on two contrasting degraded alfisols in Southwestern Nigeria. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2019;8:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-0273-7
Anbarasi M, Rajendran K. Physiological growth parameters of cotton under mechanized and conventional cultivation with varying crop geometry. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(12):408-15. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.049
Dagistan E, Akcaoz H, Demirtas B, Yilmaz Y. Energy usage and benefit-cost analysis of cotton production in Turkey. Afr J Agric Res. 2009;4(7):599-604.
Das MK, Sarangi KK, Mishra SN, Mohapatra BP, Dash A. Analysis of resource use efficiency and constraints of cotton production in Odisha, India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2022;40(12):383-89. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i121806
Dash BS, Swain SK, Behera D, Pradhan PL, Sahoo PK, Mahapatra M. Energy budgeting of paddy-pulse cropping system in Bhadrak district of Odisha and assessment of emission from paddy straw burning. J Agric Eng. 2021;58(3):222-40. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2021581.1747
Aytop Y. Determination of energy consumption and technical efficiency of cotton farms in Türkiye. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411194
Balaji GA, Geethalakshmi V, Prahadeeswaran M. Economic analysis of dryland integrated production system in western agroclimatic zone of Tamil Nadu, India: A DEA approach. Indian J Agric Res. 2023;57(2):189-93. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6039
Balaji GA, Geethalakshmi V, Senthil A, Prahadeeswaran M, Iswarya S, Rajavel M, et al. Assessment of economic efficiency and its determents for mixed crop livestock production under dryland agriculture system in the western zone of Tamil Nadu, India. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):8332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108332.
Mittal VK, Mittal JP, Dhawan KC. Research digest on energy requirements in agricultural sector (1971-82). Ludhiana, India: Co-ordinating Cell, All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Energy Requirements in Agricultural Sector, Punjab Agricultural University. 1985;259.
Ntsoane RL. Biochar and poultry litter effects on maize growth, nutrient uptake and selected soil biological activities in different soil types. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Venda, South Africa, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2291
Venkat R, Mohan SS, Rahaman S, Vinayak M, Babu BH, Reddy KV. Energy assessment of manual transplanting rice and dry direct seeding rice production systems in combined Nalgonda district, Telangana. Indian J Agric Res. 2024;58(1):95-100. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.a-5912
Wei W, Mushtaq Z, Ikram A, Faisal M, Wan-Li Z, Ahmad MI. Estimating the economic viability of cotton growers in Punjab province, Pakistan. Sage Open. 2020;10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020929310
Rani PL, Yakadri M, Mahesh N, Bhatt PS. Energy usage and economic analysis of cotton under various weed management practices. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48(1):99-101. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00026.5
Singh G, Singh P, Sodhi GPS, Tiwari D. Energy auditing and data envelopment analysis (DEA) based optimization for increased energy use efficiency in wheat cultivation (Triticum aestium L.) in north-western India. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess. 2021;47:101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101453.
Baran MF. Energy efficiency analysis of cotton production in Turkey: A case study for Adiyaman province. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2016;16(2):229-33. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1632982/v1
Devasenapathy P, Senthilkumar G, Shanmugam PM. Energy management in crop production. Indian J Agron. 2009;54:80-90. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i1.4771
Yilmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renew Energy. 2005;30(2):145-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.06.001
Zahedi M, Eshghizadeh HR, Mondani F. Energy use efficiency and economical analysis in cotton production system in an arid region: A case study for Isfahan province, Iran. Int J Energy Econ Policy. 2014;4(1):43-52. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/574
Ghorbani R, Mondani F, Amirmoradi S, Feizi H, Khorramdel S, Teimouri M, et al. A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems. Appl Energy. 2011;88(1):283-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.028
Imran M, Özçatalba? O, Bashir MK. Estimation of energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission of cotton crop in South Punjab, Pakistan. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2020;19(3):216-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2018.09.007
Iswarya S, Shanmugam PM, Somasundaram E, Chitdeshwari T, Suganthy M. Energy budgeting and efficiency analysis of organic cotton: A DEA approach. Indian J Agric Res. 2024;58(3). 389-97. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6121
Mittal JP. Research manual on energy requirements in agricultural sector. All India Coordinated Research Project on Energy in Agriculture and Agro-based Industries, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); 1988.
Tarjuelo JM, Rodriguez-Diaz JA, Abadía R, Camacho E, Rocamora C, Moreno MA. Efficient water and energy use in irrigation modernization: Lessons from Spanish case studies. Agric Water Manag. 2015;162:67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.009
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 23-11-2024 (2)
- 18-11-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 P Dhamodharan, S Somasundaram, K Thirukumaran, R Kavitha, V Ravichandran, P Anantharaju
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
