Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Impact of organic and inorganic nutrient management on yield, nutrient uptake and fibre quality of coloured cotton (Vaidehi 1)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6138
Submitted
18 November 2024
Published
15-02-2025 — Updated on 03-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

Cotton is one of the most widely grown and important fibre crops in the world, serving as the backbone of the textile industry. However, Conventional white cotton has several environmental drawbacks, including high water comsumption, reliance on synthetic chemicals and the need for dyes, which lead to soil degradation, water pollution and health risks for farmers. In contrast, organic coloured cotton offers a sustainable alternative by producing colourful fibres naturally without synthetic dyes. It also enhances soil fertility, conserves water and reduces chemical inputs, benefiting both the environment and farming communities. Therefore, field experiments were conducted at the Central farm, Agricultural College and Research Institute, TNAU, Madurai, Tamil Nadu during Kharif 2023 and Summer 2024 to evaluate a comparative assessment of organic and inorganic nutrient management practices on yield, nutrient uptake and quality parameters of coloured cotton. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with nine treatments of nitrogen (N) on an equivalent basis, using different organic manures, compared with inorganic fertilizers and replicated thrice. A significant increase in yield and nutrient uptake of coloured cotton was recorded with 100% NPK applied through site-specific recommendations (T1), which was on par with 100% NPK through blanket recommendations (T2). Organic treatments that incorporated cover crops and green manure, along with vermicompost, poultry manure and FYM, also showed comparable results to inorganic treatments. However, no significant differences were observed in the quality parameters across the various nutrient management practices.

References

  1. Behera RK, Veeresh H, Rao KN, Balanagoudar SR, Ajayakumar MY. Management of leaf reddening in Bt cotton through foliar nutrition. J Farm Sci. 2019;32(4):428–32. http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810149723
  2. Selvakumar S, Thiruppathi M, Rex Immanuel R, Sivaraman A, Chakravarthy GA. Impact of foliar fertilization of nutrients and biofertilizer on the growth and yield of hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Crop Res. 2022;57:275–80. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.CR-821
  3. Razzaq A, Zafar MM, Ali A, Hafeez A, Sharif F, Guan X, et al. The pivotal role of major chromosomes of sub-genomes A and D in fibre quality traits of cotton. Front Genet. 2022;12:642595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.642595
  4. Townsend T. World natural fibre production and employment. In: Handbook of natural fibres, Elsev. 2020;1:15–36.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818398-4.00002-5
  5. Jan M, Hussain S, Anwar-ul-Haq M, Iqbal J, Ahmad I, Aslam M, Faiz A. Effect of farm yard manure and compost application on transgenic Bt cotton varieties. Pak J Agric Res. 2020;33(2):371–80.
  6. Laghari AH, Muhammad J, Chang MS, Hakro SA, Vistro R, Mastoi SM, et al. Effect of organic manure and foliar application of boron on morphological and economic parameters of Sindh-1 and CKC3 cultivars of cotton under semi-arid climate. J Appl Res Plant Sci. 2024;5(01):19–26. https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2024.05.01.114
  7. Texmin. Annual report - Ministry of textiles, Government of India; 2022-23. Annual Report | Ministry of Textiles | GoI
  8. USDA. World Agricultural Production - Area, production and productivity of cotton. Foreign Agricultural Service/United states Department of Agriculture (Global Market Analysis); 2024. p.32. fas.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/production.pdf
  9. AICRIP. Annual Report. All India coordinated research project on cotton. Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur; 2023-24:12.aiccip.cicr.org.in/aicrp-annrep.html
  10. Ali MA, Farooq J, Batool A, Zahoor A, Azeem F, Mahmood A, Jabran K. Cotton production in Pakistan. Cotton Prod. 2019;13:249–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119385523.ch12
  11. Liu Q, Llewellyn DJ, Singh SP, Green AG. Cotton seed development: opportunities to add value to a byproduct of fibre production. Flowering and fruiting in cotton. 2012;131–62.
  12. USDA-ERS. Cotton and wool outlook. United states Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service 2013. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/cotton-and-wool/market- outlook/
  13. OCMR. Global organic cotton production 2020/21. Organic cotton market report. 2022:17-8. Textile-Exchange_OCMR_2022.pdf
  14. Patil VV, Solanke AV, Gagare YM, Tayade RV. Influence of nutrient management on growth traits of desi cotton. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(6):1208–13.
  15. Chockalingam MM. Colour cotton - An overview. A profile of Indian cotton: At a Glance; 2020:5–6. https://cotcorp.org.in/Writereaddata/Downloads/Article-ICAC-DM-CCI.pdf
  16. Keshamma E. An overview on colour cotton research - A review. Int J Eng Tech Manag Sci. 2022;6(5):272–78. https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2022.v06i05.040
  17. Naoumkina M, Hinchliffe DJ, Thyssen GN. Naturally coloured cotton for wearable applications. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1350405.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1350405
  18. Tinku RS, Rao S, Koppalkar BG, Ajayakshir MY, Swamy M. Effect of nutrient management practices on yield and economics of organic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int J Res Agron. 2024;7(2):11–15. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i2a.272
  19. Iqbal A, Qiang D, Zhun W, Xiangru W, Huiping G, Hengheng Z, et al. Growth and nitrogen metabolism are associated with nitrogen-use efficiency in cotton genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;149:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.002
  20. Snider J, Harris G, Roberts P, Meeks C, Chastain D, Bange M, Virk G. Cotton physiological and agronomic response to nitrogen application rate. Field Crops Res. 2021;270:108194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108194
  21. Khan A, Tan DKY, Munsif F, Afridi MZ, Shah F, Wei F, et al. Nitrogen nutrition in cotton and control strategies for greenhouse gas emissions: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:23471–87. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-017-0131-y
  22. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25(8):259–60. https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/25/08/0259.pdf
  23. Olsen S, Cole C, Watanabe F. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA. Circ. 1954;939–43.
  24. Stanford G, English L. Use of the flame photometer in rapid soil tests of K. Can J Agron. 1949;41:446–47. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100090012x
  25. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38.
  26. Nodal DUS centre. Guidelines for ginning properties of cotton. Nodal DUS centre, Central institute of cotton research, Nagpur; 2015. https://cicr.org.in/wp-content/uploads/dus_test_in_cotton.pdf
  27. Sundaram V, Krishna Iyer KR. In: Handbook of methods of tests for cotton fibres, yarns and fabrics. CIRCOT, Mumbai; 1979. https://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/72033/1/NEWSLETTER%20v11%20I2.PDF
  28. Sundaram V, Iyengar RLN. In: Handbook of methods of test for cotton fibre, yarns and fabrics. Cotton Technological Research Laboratory, ICAR, New Delhi; 1968 http://opacrri.rri.res.in/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=7298
  29. Jackson MI. Soil chemical analysis, Prince Hall of India Ltd. New Delhi, India; 1973. p. 100.
  30. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research (3rd ed). John Wiley and Sons, New York; 2010.
  31. Maurya AK, Singh MP, Srivastava BK, Singh YV, Singh DK, Singh S, Singh PK. Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth characters, yield and economics of sprouting broccoli cv. Fiesta. Indian J Hortic. 2008;65(1):116–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8771
  32. Gudadhe NN, Kumar N, Pisal RR, Mote BM, Dhonde MB. Evaluation of agrometeorological indices in relation to crop phenology of cotton (Gossypium spp.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at Rahuri Region of Maharashtra. Trends Biosci. 2013;6(3):246–50. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:tbs&volume=6&issue=3&article=008
  33. Nagavani AV. Effect of integrated nutrient management practices on soil fertility and productivity of maize. PhD [Thesis]. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore; 2010.
  34. Acharya CL, Rao SA, Biswas A, Sammireddy AK, Yadav R. Agriculture. In: 3rd IFOAM-ASIA science congress and general assembly Food Agriculture. 2003;19(2):41–48. https://www.organic-world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2023.html
  35. Muthukrishnan P, Thavaprakaash N, Srinivasan K. Effect of organic nutrient management practices in comparison with conventional method on performance of cotton in Tamil Nadu. Madras Agric J. 2017;104(1-3):15–22. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.01.000391
  36. Gowda CCG, Patil NK, Patil BN, Awaknavar JS, Ninganur BT, Ravi Hunje RH. Effect of organic manures on growth, seed yield and quality of wheat. Karnataka J Agril Sci. 2008;2(3):366–68. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20083314854
  37. Arora VK, Singh CB, Sidhu AS, Thind SS. Irrigation, tillage and mulching effects on soybean yield and water productivity in relation to soil texture. Agric Water Manag. 2011;98(4):563–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.004
  38. Nasab MV, Mobasser HR, Ganjali HR. Effect of different levels of vermicompost on yield and quality of maize varieties. Biol Forum Int J. 2015;7(1):856–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.004
  39. Subramanian E, Sathishkumar A, Rajesh P. Influence of different organic manures on growth, yield components and productivity of cotton. Madras Agric J. 2020;107(10-12):400–04. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.000468
  40. Ramesh S, Elankavi S, Jawahar S, Suseendran K. Dynamics of nitrogen by the combined use of organic compost and inorganic fertilizer nitrogen on nutrient uptake and post-harvest soil fertility status in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int J Res Anal Rev. 2017:767–72. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3678016
  41. Meena MK, Meena RN, Meena BR, Meena AK, Singh YV. Effect of land management options and manurial application on growth, yield and quality and nutrient uptake of American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivation. J Pharm Phytochem. 2019;8(1):549–54. https://www.phytojournal.com/archives?year=2019&vol=8&issue=1&ArticleId=6787
  42. Islam MK, Khalequzzaman K, Kaikobad M. Effect of organic and inorganic source of N on cotton yield. Annu Res Rev. 2014;131–42. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2311.9362
  43. Pandiselvi T, Manoharan S. Yield and NPK uptake of cotton in response to different nutrient management practices. Trends in Biosciences. 2015;8(1):102–05.
  44. Gudadhe NN, Khang VT, Thete NM, Lambade BM, Jibhkate SB. Studies on organic and inorganic sources of nutrient application in cotton-chickpea cropping sequence. Omonrice. 2011;18:121–28.
  45. Kumar A, Meena RN, Yadav L, Gilotia YK. Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrient on yield, yield attributes and nutrient uptake of rice cv. PRH-10. The Bioscan. 2014;9(2):595–98.
  46. Vani KP, Rekha BK, Nalini N. Yield and nutrient uptake of Bt cotton as influenced by composted waste, organic and inorganic fertilizers. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 2021;9(34):432–41.
  47. Sangameshwari P, Veeral KD. Effect of integrated nutrient management on nutrient uptake and soil fertility status of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int J Creat Res Thoughts. 2022;10(2):863–73.
  48. Kshirsagar AG, Charjan YD, Wankhade RS, Nage SM. Organic nutrient management in colour cotton. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;SP-8(7):807–13. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i7Sk.1650
  49. Solunke PS, Fatak SU. Effect of organic manures, inorganic fertilizers and plant protection on quality and economics of desi cotton. J Cotton Res Dev. 2010;24(2):174–81. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20103297963
  50. Blaise D, Rupa TR, Bonde AN. Effect of organic and modern method of cotton cultivation on soil nutrient status. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2004;35(9-10):1247–61. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120037543
  51. Venegopal V. Changing paradigms (avenues/ approaches) in cotton production technologies for improving productivity and fibre quality of cotton. In: Proceedings International Symposium: ‘Strategies for Sustainable Crop Production- A Global Vision’ on 23-25 Nov, held at University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka (India); 2004. p. 1–6.
  52. Hallikeri SS, Halemani HL, Nandagavi RA, Nooli SS. Response of Mahyco Bt cotton hybrids to levels of fertilizer under protective irrigation. In: Proceedings International Symposium: ‘Strategies for Sustainable Crop Production - A Global Vision’ on 23-25 Nov, held at University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka (India); 2002. p. 139–41.
  53. Narayana E, Hema K, Srinivasulu K, Prasad NV, Rao NH. Agronomic evaluation of Gossypium hirsutum hybrids for varied spacings and nitrogen levels in vertisols under rainfed conditions. J Cotton Res Dev. 2007;21(2):197–200.
  54. Narayana E, Aparna D, Rao CM, Prasad DH. Performance of cotton hybrids (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under different spacings and nitrogen levels in black cotton soils of coastal Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Agric J. 2008;55(4):422–25.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.