Impact of weed management practices on weed control efficiency and fibre quality in cotton under the high-density planting system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6221

Keywords:

cotton, fibre quality, weed management, yield

Abstract

Cotton enjoyed the synonyms ‘White Gold,’ ‘King of Fibre Crops,’ and ‘Friendly Fibre’, playing a vital role as both a cash and fibre crop in India. However, weeds pose a major challenge, causing an approximate 45% yield reduction in cotton nationwide. Effective weed management is crucial for optimizing cotton yield and fibre quality. This study evaluated the impact of various weed management practices on productivity and fibre quality. Field trials were conducted using multiple treatments, including pre-and post-emergence herbicides, hand weeding, and power weeding. Fibre quality parameters, such as fibre length, strength, fineness, micronaire, and elongation percentage, were measured across treatments. While results showed no significant differences in fibre quality among the treatments, the combination of preemergence (PE) application of Pendimethalin at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 + Metolachlor at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 followed by post-emergence (POE) application of Pyrithiobac sodium at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 + quizalofop ethyl at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 emerged as the most effective weed control strategy.This treatment provided effective weed suppression, reduced competition for resources, and resulted in a higher seed cotton yield than other treatments. The study concluded that, although fibre quality did not vary significantly, the integrated use of Pendimethalin and Metolachlor as preemergence herbicides and Pyrithiobac sodium and quizalofop ethyl as post-emergence herbicides offers an optimal solution for cotton growers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Raut SA, Meshram JH, Lal EP. Effect of mepiquat chloride on cotton var Suraj shoot and root growth behaviour. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(3):946-50.

Dogan M, Jabran K, Unay A. Integrated weed management in cotton. In: Chauhan BS, Mahajan G, editors. Recent advances in weed management. New York: Springer; 2014. p.197–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1019-9_9

Kumar M, Premalatha N, Mahalingam L, Sakthivel N, Senguttuvan K, Latha P. High density planting system of cotton in India: Status and breeding strategies. In: Abdurakhmonov IY, editor. Plant breeding - Current and future views. London: IntechOpen; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94905

Cotton report [Internet]. Ministry of Textiles, India. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 25]. Available from: https://www.texmin.nic.in/sites/default/files/Cotton%20Production%20and%20consumption%20in%20Major%20countries-1.pdf

NFSM. A Brief note on cotton. National Food Security Mission. Government of India. 2019. https://www.nfsm.gov.in/BriefNote/BN_Cotton.pdf

Arunvenkatesh S, Rajendran K. Evaluation of plant density and cotton genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on cotton yield and fibre quality. Madras Agric J. 2015;102(1-3):22–25. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.001059

Venugopalan MV, Kranthi KR, Blaise D, Laghde S, Shankaranarayanan K. High density planting system in cotton- the Brazil Experience and Indian Initiatives. Cotton Research Journal. 2013;5(2):172-85.

Dogan MN, Ünay A, Boz BÖZ, Albay F. Determination of optimum weed control timing in maize (Zea mays L.). Turk J Agric For. 2004;28:349–54.

Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M. Cotton production and uses. Agronomy, Crop Protection and Postharvest Technologies (Springer Nature Singapore Pvt Ltd). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2

Hakoomat A, Arooj M, Sarwar N, Areeb A, Shahzad AN, Hussain S. Application of pre and post emergence herbicide under improved field irrigation system proved a sustainable weed management strategy in cotton crop. Planta Daninha. 2017;35:e017158976. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582017350100052

Dharani M, Rathika S, Avudaithai S, Baskar M, Meena S, Ramesh T. Effect of herbigation on weed control and yield of drip irrigated cotton. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;8;35(21):1003–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i214071

Prasad YG, Venugopalan MV, Ramkrushna GI, Pande R, Nagrale DT. High density planting system for cotton. CICR Technical Bulletin. 2023;2023/2. Nagpur: ICAR - Central Institute for Cotton Research. Available from: https://cicr.org.in/wp-content/uploads/TC_BL-2023-02.pdf

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd Edition. New York: John Willey and Sons;1984.

Mani VS, Malla MS, Gautam KC. Weed killing chemicals in potato cultivation. Indian Farming. 1973;23(1):17-18.

Gill HS. Weed index-A new method for reporting weed control trials. Indian J Agron. 1969;14:96-98.

Turner AJ. Ginning percentage and lint index of cotton in relation to the number of cotton fibres per seed—The effect of environment on ginning percentage and the determination of unit-fibre weight. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions.1929;20(9):T233–T274. https://doi.org/10.1080/19447022908661495

Paul RAI, Srinivasan G, Veeramani A, Vendan RT. Effect of sequential application of herbicides on weed density, weed dry weight and yield of irrigated maize. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(10):1128-35. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.135

Sreena KS, Yadahalli GS, Chittapur BM, Ajayakumar MY, Bhat SN, Naik N. Significance of weed flora identification and its management on Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growing tract of Tungabhadra command area. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):781-89. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183374

Nalini K, Muthukrishnan P, Chinnusamy C. Evaluation of Pendimethalin 38.7 EC on weed management in winter irrigated cotton. Madras Agric J. 2011;98(4-6):165-68. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.100267

Manalil S, Coast O, Werth J, Chauhan BS. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through weed-crop competition: A review. Crop Prot. 2017;95:53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.008

Reddy V, Kulkarni S, Chavan M, Ajayakumar MY. Effects of integrated weed management practices on weed parameters and yield of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(11):324-31. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113175

Panchal PS, Patel VJ, Chaudhari DD, Dohat MP. Evaluation of different herbicides on growth, yield attributes and yield of Bt cotton and their residual effect on succeeding summer groundnut. Pharma Innovation. 2022;11(12):2121-424.

Yernaidu Y, Ardeshna RB, Tripathi S, Usdadiya VP, Arvadiya LK, Garde YA. Weed parameters and weed indices as influenced by different weed management practices in Bt cotton. Int J Res Agron. 2024;7(4):441-48. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i4f.611

Yang Y, Li Y, Yang J, Wen J. Dissimilarity-based active learning for embedded weed identification. Turk J Agric For. 2022;46(3):390-401. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3011

Published

28-02-2025

How to Cite

1.
Nageswari R, Sanjay Kumar T, Anitha R, Dhanushkodi V, Sujatha KB, Satheeshkumar N, Rajarathinam P, Somasundaram S, Rathika S, Ramesh T. Impact of weed management practices on weed control efficiency and fibre quality in cotton under the high-density planting system. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 28 [cited 2025 Apr. 17];12(sp1). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/6221

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>