Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes for growth and yield traits

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6482
Submitted
2 December 2024
Published
26-11-2025

Abstract

Onion is an economically important vegetable crop, widely cultivated for its culinary, nutritional and processing value. India ranks second globally in onion production; however productivity remains lower compared to several other countries, highlighting the need for genotype evaluation and improvement. The present investigation was carried out during the 2022–23 rabi season at the Department of Horticulture, University of Agricultural Science (UAS), GKVK, Bengaluru, to assess 18 onion genotypes collected from different districts of Karnataka, along with a check variety, Bhima Super. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications under red sandy loam soil conditions. Data were recorded on 23 growth, yield and quality parameters. Significant variability was observed among genotypes for most of the traits studied. Seed germination ranged from 35.31 % (Nagpur Local) to 98.08 % (Bidar Local-2). At 90 Days after transplanting (DAT), plant height varied between 54.39 cm (Nagpur Local) to 66.54 cm (Bidar Local-1). Yield attributes revealed that Bidar Local-2 exhibited the highest bulb weight (107.30 g), ten-bulb weight (1270 g) and yield per ha (46.23 t/ha), exceeding the check variety (42.19 t/ha). Quality parameters also showed distinct differences, with Bidar Local-4 recording the highest total soluble solids (TSS) content (16.40 °Brix) and Gadag Local-4 showing the minimum neck thickness (0.57 cm), a desirable trait for improved storability. Based on overall growth, yield and quality performance, Bidar Local-2, Bidar Local-1, Chitradurga Local-1 and Bellary Local were identified as promising genotypes. These superior genotypes may serve both for direct cultivation and as valuable genetic resources in onion crop improvement programs. 

References

  1. 1. Bal S, Maity T, Maji A. Evaluation of onion genotypes for growth, yield and quality traits under gangetic-alluvial plains of west bengal. Int J Chem Stud. 2020; 8: 2157-2162. DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7415
  2. 2. Upadhyay A, Dubey AK, Pandey P, Singh V, Dixit S. Evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) accessions for yield attributes and yield for central Uttar Pradesh. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020; 9(3): 1457-1459. DOI: 10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i3x.11516
  3. 3. Anonymous. Annual report of area and production of horticulture crops. Indiastat agri.; 2022
  4. 4. Amarananjundeswara H, Suhas YH, Aravinda Kumar JS, Gowda VR, Reddy MTB. Evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes for growth and yield parameters under eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Int. J Che. Stud. 2020; 8(6): 2790-279. DOI: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6an.11203
  5. 5. Singh PR, Mahajan V, Verma A, Lalramhlimi B, Khade YP, Gedam P, Shukla N, Sogam O, Singh M. Genetic variability, character association and path analysis for different traits in white onion genotypes under short day condition. J Environ Biol. 2021; 4(3): 401-411. DOI: 10.22438/jeb/43/3/MRN-1990
  6. 6. Ajayi AT, Adekola MO, Taiwo BH, Azuh VO. Character expression and differences in yield potential of ten genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Int J Plant Res. 2014; 4(3): 63-71. DOI: 10.5923/j.plant.20140403.01
  7. 7. Patel DM, Varma LR, Kumari S. Varietal evaluation of vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) with respect to plant growth, flowering and fruiting behavior under north Gujarat condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018; 7(7): 3913-3920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.707.455
  8. 8. Umamaheswarappa P, Naik AH. Evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes for growth, yield and quality parameters under central dry zone of Karnataka. Int J Environ Sci. 2015; 33 (2A): 992-995
  9. 9. Hirave PS, Wagh AP, Alekar AN, Kharde RP. Performance of red onion varieties in kharif season under Akola conditions. J Hortic. 2015; 2(2); 1-3. DOI: 10.4172/2376-0354.1000132
  10. 10. Tripathy P, Sahoo BB, Dash DK. Evaluation of rabi onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes under western table land of odisha. Int J Farm Sci. 2016; 6(3): 216-22. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20354.09922
  11. 11. Dubey S, Verma S, Chandrakar K, Keshari R. Suitability of kharif onion varieties in Mahasamund district of Chhattisgarh. J Krishi Vigyan. 2019; 7(2): 243-247. DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2019.00040.0
  12. 12. Prithiani S, Dighe SS, Jakhar R, Pushpa K, Gautam D. Evaluation of different varieties on growth characteristics of onion (Allium cepa L.). J Pharm Innov. 2022; 11(3): 386-388
  13. 13. Meghana N, Prakash K, Srinivasa V, Kantharaj Y, Shashikala SK. Assessment of onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties for growth and yield attributes under central dry zone of Karnataka. J. Pharm. Innov. 2021; 10(12): 1712-1715
  14. 14. Roy A, Islam AFMS, Tabassum R. Morphological features and yield evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes in acid soil. Int J Plant Breed. 2016; 10(3): 116-124. DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2016.116.124
  15. 15. Behera TK, Mandal J, Mohanta S, Padhiary AK, Behera S, Behera D, Rout RK. Assessment of growth, yield and quality of onion genotypes under red and laterite zone of West Bengal. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017: 6(6): 493-497
  16. 16. Fathima AF, Paramaguru P, Lakshmanan V, Venkatesan K. (2019). Evaluation of aggregatum onion (Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum Don.) genotypes for yield and quality traits. J Agric Eco. 2019; 8: 75-83. DOI: http://doi.org/10.53911/JAE
  17. 17. Gautam IP, Pradhan NG, Luitel BP, Subedi S. Evaluation of Onion Genotypes for Growth and Bulb Yield in Mid Hill of Nepal. J Nep Agric Res. 2019; 5: 53-61. DOI: 10.3126/jnarc.v5i1.23805
  18. 18. Naresh B, Thapa U, Choudhuri P, Thakur P, Majumder A. Performance of Different Onion (Allium cepa L.) Genotypes in Rabi Season under Short Day Conditions of West Bengal. Biol Forum. 2021; 13(4): 242-247
  19. 19. Peerzade DA, Harish, BN. Evaluation of onion genotypes for different economic traits in central dry zone of Karnataka. Glob J Res Anal. 2017; 8(4): 502-503
  20. 20. Mane NV, Kale VS, Karande PJ, Nagre PK, Sonkamble AM, Kayande NV. Evaluation of different onion varieties and genotypes. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020; 9(6): 1108-1110.
  21. 21. Thingalmaniyan KS, Rohini N, Arumugam T. Performance evaluation of aggregatum onion genotypes (Allium cepa var. aggregatum) for yield, quality and resistance characters. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017; 6(9): 634-642. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas. 2017.606.075
  22. 22. Dhar M, Mandal J, Maity TK, Mohanta S. Evaluation of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties under different planting dates. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019; 8(2): 1317-1321
  23. 23. Gupta N, Bhargav KS, Dixit AK. Evaluation of Kharif Onion (Allium cepa L.) Varieties in Malwa Agro Climatic Zone of Madhya Pradesh. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020; 9(12): 2722-2727. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.323
  24. 24. Gosai JA, Rathawa SA, Dhakad R, Jatav A, Verma LR. Evaluation of Different Varieties of Onion (Allium cepa L.) under North Gujarat Condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018; 7(5): 3775-3780. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.438
  25. 25. Tripathy P, Sahoo BB, Priyadarshini A, Das SK, Dash DK. Standardization of kharif onion cultivars. Int J Bio-res Stress Manag; 2014; 5(2): 269-274. DOI: 10.5958/0976-4038.2014.00566.1
  26. 26. Agnivesh Yadav, RK Singh, Suraj Luthra, Rakesh Kumar, Chandroday Prakash Tiwari, Virendra Kumar, Ramesh Rajbhar, Lalu Prasad. Evaluation of Onion (Allium Cepa L.) Genotypes for Yield and Its Attributes Traits under Bundelkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology; 2024; 27 (5):32–40. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i5759
  27. 27. Imran M, Kang H, Kim EH, Lee SG, Park HM, Choi H. Environmental and genetic effects on phytochemical and nutritional composition of onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties in South Korea. Frontiers in Plant Science; 2025; 16: 1649912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1649912
  28. 28. Kim SH, Iwar, Han J, Choi I, Lee J, Ochar K. Variability of bulb morpho-geometrical properties in onion (Allium cepa L.) germplasm collections, using digital imaging tools. Frontiers in Plant Science; 2025; 16: 12338057.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.