Pelletization as a forage conservation technique: Enhancing feed efficiency and sustainability in livestock
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7123Keywords:
animal nutrition, feed and fodder, feed conversion, pelleting of feeds, sustainable livestock managementAbstract
Integrating crop and livestock production, especially with cattle, is vital for food security and economic growth in India. The livestock sector helps increase farm income, boosts the national economy, and provides employment opportunities for millions of people. However, productivity lags global standards due to shortages of quality feeds, including green fodder, dry fodder, and concentrates. Stagnant fodder crop cultivation and dwindling permanent pastures exacerbate the challenge of meeting the rising demand for milk and meat. Addressing these issues is crucial for enhancing livestock productivity and sustaining agriculture. This review highlights the importance of fodder pelletization, compressing animal feeds into dense pellets using a pellet mill. Pelleted feeds offer balanced diets, improved digestibility, and nutrient absorption, with benefits including long-lasting preservation, enhanced handling, stability, bulk density, and palatability. Factors influencing the pelleting process, such as ingredient characteristics, drying, grinding, conditioning, steam pressure, and moisture content, are examined in depth. The positive effects of pelleted feed on ruminant growth and productivity, particularly in cattle and goats, are emphasized, including improvements in milk yield, weight gain, and reproductive performance. These findings emphasize the potential of pelletized feed to address challenges related to fodder scarcity, feed wastage, and transportation costs. This provides valuable insights for efficient diet management in livestock production.
Downloads
References
Singh DN, Bohra JS, Tyagi V, Singh T, Banjara TR, Gupta G. A review of India’s fodder production status and opportunities. Grass Forage Sci. 2022;77(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12561
Fadlalla I M. The interactions of some mineral elements in health and reproductive performance of dairy cows. New Advances in the Dairy Industry. 2002.
Roy A, Agrawal R, Bhardwaj N, Mishra A, Mahanta S. Revisiting national forage demand and availability scenario. Indian fodder scenario: Redefining state-wise status. Jhansi (India): ICAR-AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization; 2019:1-21.
Halli HM, Rathore S, Manjunatha N, Wasnik VK. Advances in agronomic management for ensuring fodder security in semi-arid zones of India - A Review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(2):1912-21. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.230
Meena L, Kochewad S, Kumar V, Malik S, Kumar S, Meena LK, et al. Status of fodder production in the existing farming systems in Muzaffarnagar district of Uttar Pradesh. Range Manag Agrofor. 2018;39(2):313-8.
Naik P, Dhuri R, Swain B, Singh N. Nutrient changes with the growth of hydroponics fodder maize. Indian J Anim Nutr. 2012;29(2):161-3
Behnke KC. Feed manufacturing technology: current issues and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996;62(1):49-57.
Aher V, Tambe A, Manjare M, Desale J. Forage Research in Maharashtra. Rahuri (MS): Forage Research Project, MPKV; 2003.
Hancock JD, Behnke KC. Use of ingredient and diet processing technologies (grinding, mixing, pelleting and extruding) to produce quality feeds for pigs. In: Swine Nutrition. CRC Press. 2000:489-518. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041842.ch21
Veum T, Serrano X, Hsieh F. Twin- or single-screw extrusion of raw soybeans and preconditioned soybean meal and corn as individual ingredients or as corn-soybean product blends in diets for weanling swine. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(3):1288-300. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1081
Koech OK, Kinuthia RN, Karuku GN, Mureithi SM, Wanjogu R. Field curing methods and storage duration affect the quality of hay from six rangeland grass species in Kenya. Ecol. process. 2016; 5:1-6.
Ogunade IM, Martinez-Tuppia C, Queiroz OC, Jiang Y, Drouin P, Wu F, et al. Silage review: Mycotoxins in silage: Occurrence, effects, prevention and mitigation. J. Dairy Sci. 2018 May 1;101(5):4034-59.
Balehegn M, Ayantunde A, Amole T, Njarui D, Nkosi BD, Müller FL, et al. Forage conservation in sub?Saharan Africa: Review of experiences, challenges and opportunities. Agron J. 2022;114(2):75-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20954
Jones FT. A review of practical Salmonella control measures in animal feed. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2011 Mar 1;20(1):102-13. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00281
Huss A, Cochrane R, Jones C, Atungulu GG. Physical and chemical methods for the reduction of biological hazards in animal feeds. In Food and feed safety systems and analysis 2018 Jan 1:83-95. Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811835-1.00005-1
Choudhary B, Sharma P, Phand S, Gupta G, Sharma R. Agripreneurship development on value added fodder products [E-book]. Hyderabad: National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management & ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi (UP). 2021.
Angmo K. A fodder conservation technology in cold arid region of Ladakh, India - Mini Review. J Eco-Sci Technol. 2020;1(1):19-28.
Amutham G, Sakthivel N, Sivakumar S, Ganesan K, Thirunavukkarasu M. The nutrient dynamics of major and minor nutrients on pelleted and unpelleted dry fodders. Asian J Dairy Food Res. 2023;42(4):552-6. https://doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.DR-2008
Schoeff R, Fairchild F, Bursiek B, Castaldo D. History of the formula feed industry. Feed Manuf Technol IV. 1994:7.
Lancheros JP, Espinosa CD, Stein HH. Effects of particle size reduction, pelleting and extrusion on the nutritional value of ingredients and diets fed to pigs: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;268:114603.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114603
Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Use of feed technology to improve the nutritional value of feed ingredients. Anim Prod Sci. 2016;56(8):1312-6. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15354
Rueda M, Rubio AA, Starkey CW, Mussini F, Pacheco WJ. Effect of conditioning temperature on pellet quality, performance, nutrient digestibility and processing yield of broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2022;31(2):100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2022.100235
Gulecyuz E, Kilic U. Pelleting forage and usability in ruminant nutrition. 12th National Zootechnia Student Congress; 2016:9-11.
Lambo MT, Chang X, Liu D. The recent trend in the use of multistrain probiotics in livestock production: An overview. Animals. 2021 Sep 26;11(10):2805.
Boudalia S, Smeti S, Dawit M, Senbeta EK, Gueroui Y, Dotas V, et al. Alternative approaches to feeding small ruminants and their potential benefits. Animals. 2024;14(6):904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060904
Brereton JE. Size matters: A review of the effect of pellet size on animal behaviour and digestion. J Food Sci Nutrifion. 2021;7:1-6.
Weiss CP, Gentry WW, Meredith CM, Meyer BE, Cole NA, Tedeschi LO, McCollum III FT, Jennings JS. Effects of roughage inclusion and particle size on digestion and ruminal fermentation characteristics of beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 2017Apr1;95(4):1707-14.
Wood KM, Damiran D, Smillie J, Lardner HA, Larson K, Penner GB. Effects of pellet size and inclusion of binding agents on ruminal fermentation and total-tract digestibility of beef heifers and cow performance under winter grazing conditions. Appl Anim Sci. 2019;35(2):227-37.
Przyby?o M, Krajda G, Ró?a?ski ?, Rolik G, Ortmann S, Górka P, Clauss M. Fluid and particle retention in a small New World and a small Old World cervid, the southern pudu (Pudu puda) and Reeves's muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2023;285:111506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2023.111506
Jahan M, Asaduzzaman M, Sarkar A. Performance of broiler fed on mash, pellet and crumble. Int J Poult Sci. 2006;5(3):265-70. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.265.270
Huang X, Christensen C, Yu P. Effects of conditioning temperature and time during the pelleting process on feed molecular structure, pellet durability index and metabolic features of co-products from bio-oil processing in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(7):4869-81. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9290
Orden E, Cruz E, Espino A, Battad Z, Reyes R, Orden M, et al. Pelletized forage-based rations as alternative feeds for improving goat productivity. Trop Grassl. 2013;2(1):108-10. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(2)108-110
Phillips W, Rao S, Fitch J, Mayeux H. Digestibility and dry matter intake of diets containing alfalfa and kenaf. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(11):2989-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80112989x
Lailer P, Dahiya S, Chauhan T. Complete feed for livestock: concept, present status and future trend: A review. Indian J Anim Sci. 2005;75(1):84-91.
Oyaniran D, Ojo V, Aderinboye R, Bakare B, Olanite J. Effect of pelleting on nutritive quality of forage legumes. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2018;30(4).
Shrinivasa D, Mathur S. Compound feed production for livestock. Curr Sci. 2020;118(4):553-9. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v118/i4/553-559
Kim JC, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. A comparison of waxy versus non-waxy wheats in diets for weaner pigs: effects of particle size, enzyme supplementation and collection day on total tract apparent digestibility and pig performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2005;120(1-2):51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.004
Zelenka J. Effect of pelleting on digestibility and metabolizable energy values of poultry diet. 2003;239-42.
Cavalcanti WB, Behnke KC. Effect of composition of feed model systems on pellet quality: a mixture experimental approach. II. Cereal Chem. 2005;82(4):462-7. https://doi.org/10.1094/CC-82-0462
Tauqir N, Sarwar M, Jabbar M, Mahmood S. Nutritive value of jumbo grass (Sorghum bicolour Sorghum sudanefe) silage in lactating Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Pak Vet J. 2009;29(1):5-10.
Abdollahi M, Ravindran V, Svihus B. Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;179(1-4):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.10.011
Selle P, Liu S, Cai J, Cowieson A. Steam-pelleting and feed form of broiler diets based on three coarsely ground sorghums influences growth performance, nutrient utilisation, starch and nitrogen digestibility. Anim Prod Sci. 2012;52(9):842-52. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12026
Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017;8:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0177-1
Singh M, Tripathi M, Dixit A, Singh S. Effect of straw type (Cajnus cajan or Cicer arietinum) and form of diet on growth, feed efficiency and slaughter performance of weaned Jamunapari goat kids. Indian J Anim Sci. 2016;86(3):329-34. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i3.56760
Beigh YA, Ganai AM, Ahmad HA. Prospects of complete feed system in ruminant feeding: A review. Vet World. 2017;10(4):424-37. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.424-437
Adesogan AT, Arriola KG, Jiang Y, Oyebade A, Paula EM, Pech-Cervantes AA, et al. Symposium review: Technologies for improving fiber utilization. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(6):5726-55. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15334
Ajayi F. Nutritional evaluation of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum cv Ntchisi) intercropped with some legumes for West African dwarf goats [Thesis]. University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 2008.
Li B, Sun X, Huo Q, Zhang G, Wu T, You P, et al. Pelleting of a total mixed ration affects growth performance of fattening lambs. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:629016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.629016
Hidayat T, Espinoza MER, Yan X, Theodoridou K, Peng Q, Feng B, et al. The utilization of prairie-based blend pellet products combined with newly commercial phytochemicals (feed additives) to mitigate ruminant methane emission and improve animal performance. In: Feed additives–recent trends in animal nutrition (working title). InTechOpen. 2024.
Udakwar S, Sarode D. Production and characterization of pellets from agricultural residue: cotton, tur and soybean. Indian J Prod Therm Eng. 2023;3(4):1-10.
Rodino S, Voicila DN, Sterie CM. The use of forestry and agricultural biomass in the production of pellets. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 2024;18(1):955-64. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0083
Iskenderov R, Lebedev A, Zacharin A, Lebedev P. Evaluating effectiveness of grinding process grain materials. Eng Rural Dev. 2018;17:102-8. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N147
Thomas M, Hendriks W, Van der Poel A. Size distribution analysis of wheat, maize and soybeans and energy efficiency using different methods for coarse grinding. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018;240(1):11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.03.010
Amin SAS, Sobhi N. Process optimization in poultry feed mill. Sci Rep. 2023;13:9897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36072-w
Sajjadi H, Ebrahimi SH, Vakili SA, Rohani A, Golzarian MR, Miri VH. Operational conditions and potential benefits of grains micronization for ruminants: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2022;287(1):115285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115285
Wu J, Ebadian M, Kim KH, Kim CS, Saddler J. The use of steam pretreatment to enhance pellet durability and the enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of pellets to fermentable sugars. Bioresour Technol. 2022;347:126731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126731
Dinesha P, Kumar S, Rosen MA. Biomass briquettes as an alternative fuel: A comprehensive review. Energy Technol. 2019;7(5):1801011. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201801011
Misljenovic N, Colovic R, Vukmirovic D, Brlek T, Bringas CS. The effects of sugar beet molasses on wheat straw pelleting and pellet quality. A comparative study of pelleting by using a single pellet press and a pilot-scale pellet press. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;144(2):220-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.01.001
Muley S, Nandgude T, Poddar S. Extrusion–spheronization a promising pelletization technique: In-depth review. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2016;11(6):684-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2016.08.001
Chen Z, Yu G, Wang Q, Yuan X, Ning T, Jin S. Design and experiment of flat die pellet mill with plunger. Trans Chinese Soc Agric Eng. 2015;31(19):31-8. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.19.005
Jackson J, Turner A, Mark T, Montross M. Densification of biomass using a pilot scale flat ring roller pellet mill. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;148(1):43-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.02.024
Sibbald I. The effect of cold pelleting on the true metabolizable energy values of cereal grains fed to adult roosters and a comparison of observed with predicted metabolizable energy values. Poult Sci. 1976;55:970-4.
Braginets SV, Bakhchevnikov ON, Deev KA. Influence of various parameters on the vegetable raw material pelleting process and pellets quality. Agrar Sci Euro-North-East. 2023;24(1):30-45. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.1.30-45
Reimer L, Beggs W. Making better pellets: Harnessing steam quality. Feed Manag. 1993;44(1):22. Kansas State University.
Bastiaansen TMM, de Vries S, Martens BMJ, Benders RT, Vissers E, Dijksman JA, et al. Identifying feed characteristics that affect the pellet manufacturing of livestock diets containing different coproducts. Clean Circular Bioeconomy. 2024;7:100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100073
Gageanu I, Persu C, Cujbescu D, Gheorghe G, Voicu G. Influence of using additives on quality of pelletized fodder. Eng Rural Dev. 2019;18:362-7. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N174
Kirkpinar F, Basmacioglu H. Effects of pelleting temperature of phytase supplemented broiler feed on tibia mineralization, calcium and phosphorus content of serum and performance. Czech J Anim Sci. 2006;51(2):78. https://doi.org/10.17221/3913-CJAS
Wang KH, Hooks CR. Plant-parasitic nematodes and their associated natural enemies within banana (Musa spp.) plantings in Hawaii. Nematropica. 2009;39(1):57-74.
El-Mottaleb A, Ebaid M, Hemeda B. Using solar energy to dry Egyptian clover. Misr J Agric Eng. 2010;27(4):1228-42. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2010.104818
Dubrovin AV. Method and device of normative, technologically and economically optimal combined infrared and conductive drying of moving bulk feed for livestock and poultry farming. Invention Disclosure. 2017.
Razumovskaya ES. Study of the influence of the dehydration process on the quality and safety of animal feed. Siberian Bull Agric Sci. 2023;52(6):70-7. https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2022-6-8
Ammala A. Comparison of pin mill and hammer mill in the fine grinding of sphagnum moss. Energies. 2023 Mar 3;16(5):2437.
Volkhonov MS, Abalikhin AM, Barabanov DV, Krupin AV, Mukhanov NV. Determination of optimal operating modes of a centrifugal grinder for feed grain. Agrarian Sci. 2023;(6):111-5. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-371-6-111-115
Gilpin A, Herrman T, Behnke K, Fairchild F. Feed moisture, retention time and steam as quality and energy utilization determinants in the pelleting process. Appl Eng Agric. 2002;18(3):331. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.8585
Van Rooijen C, Bosch G, Wierenga PA, Hendriks WH, van der Poel AF. The effect of steam pelleting of a dry dog food on the Maillard reaction. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;198(2):238-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.10.006
Amerah A, Ravindran V, Lentle R, Thomas D. Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World's Poult Sci J. 2007;63(3):439-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001560
Truelock CN, Ward NE, Wilson JW, Stark CR, Paulk CB. Effect of steam pressure and conditioning temperature during the pelleting process on phytase stability. Kans Agric Exp Stn Res Rep. 2019;5(8):28. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.7858
Kort R, Wecker H, Fiehler C, Ogles A, Froetschner J, Stark CR, Paulk CB. Moisture content throughout the pelleting process and subsequent effects on pellet quality. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(Supplement_3):228-9. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.8010
Fasina OO. Physical properties of peanut hull pellets. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(5):1259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.041
Theerarattananoon K, Xu F, Wilson J, Ballard R, Mckinney L, Staggenborg S, et al. Physical properties of pellets made from sorghum stalk, corn stover, wheat straw and big bluestem. Ind Crops Prod. 2011;33(2):325-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.11.014
Tang Y, Chandra RP, Sokhansanj S, Saddler JN. The role of biomass composition and steam treatment on durability of pellets. Bioenergy Res. 2018;11:341-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-018-9900-9
Mores ICV, Muramatsu K, Maiorka A, Orlando UAD, da Silva JMS, de Paulo LM, et al. Pelleting on the nutritional quality of broiler feeds. J Agric Stud. 2020;8(3):193-206. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v8i3.16072
Cutlip SE, Hott J, Buchanan N, Rack A, Latshaw J, Moritz J. The effect of steam-conditioning practices on pellet quality and growing broiler nutritional value. J Appl Poult Res. 2008;17(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00081
Covelli CR, Yi H, Karamchandani A, Ciolkosz D, Puri VM. Evaluation of dry steam preconditioning on switchgrass pellet quality metrics. Appl Eng Agric. 2018;34(4):637-44. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.12688
Aganga A, Tshwenyane S. Lucerne, lablab and Leucaena leucocephala forages: Production and utilization for livestock production. Pak J Nutr. 2003;2(1):46-53. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2003.46.53
Patel PS, Alagundagi S, Salakinkop S. The anti-nutritional factors in forages–A review. Curr Biotica. 2013;6(4):516-26.
Chasse E, Guay F, Letourneau-Montminy MP. Effect of pelleting on nutrients and energy digestibility in growing pigs fed corn-soybean meal-based diet or diet containing corn distillers dried grains with solubles (cDDGS), wheat middlings and bakery meal. Can J Anim Sci. 2021;102(1):108-16. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2021-0060
Astuti A, Rochijan R, Widyobroto BP, Mira L. Evaluating of nutrient composition and pellet durability index on pellet supplement with different proportion of protected soybean meal (P-SBM) and selenium (Se). In: 9th International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production (ISTAP 2021). 2022 Feb:103-7. Atlantis Press.
Retnani Y, Risyahadi ST, Qomariyah N, Barkah NN, Taryati T, Jayanegara A. Comparison between pelleted and unpelleted feed forms on the performance and digestion of small ruminants: a meta-analysis. J Anim Feed Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/149192/2022
Wang H, Li L, Zhang N, Zhang T, Ma Y. Effects of pelleting and long-term high-temperature stabilization on vitamin retention in swine feed. Animals. 2022;12(9):1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091058
Jaelani A, Rostini T, Zakir MI, Sugiarti S, Fitryani R. Maintaining the physical quality and digestibility of pellet feed through the use of plant-based pellet binder. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2024;11(1):93. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k752
Stojkov V, Rakita S, Banjac V, Fišteš A, Bojani? N, Raki? D, et al. Soybean molasses has a positive impact on the pelleting process and physical quality of dairy feed pellets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2023;304:115738. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17109
Ayoola OA. Influence of the animal feed binders on optimal nutritional and physical qualities of the animal feed pellets and feed production capacity-A literature review. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725193
Azad MH, Tiwari M, Alam P, Pokhrel B. Development of forage pellet feeding technology for dairy animals. Nepal J Agric Sci. 2019;18(1):79-90.
Ahmed S, Rakib M, Hemayet M, Roy B, Jahan N. Effect of total mixed ration based complete pellet feed on the performances of stall-fed native sheep. SAARC J Agric. 2020;18(2):157-66. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v18i2.51116
Pankajakshan P, Arunima CP. Effect of Moringa leaf pellets as an additional feed component on milk yield of lactating cows. EC Vet Sci. 2020;5:45-53.
Reddy G, Reddy KJ, Nagalakshmi D. Nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation pattern of sugarcane bagasse based complete diets in buffalo bulls. Indian J Anim Nutr. 2001;18:138-45.
Roy B, Ahmed S, Sarker N, Roy A, Yajuvendra S. The effect of feeding different roughages in pelleted diets on growth performance of Black Bengal goats. Indian Vet J. 2010;87(1):905-7.
Orden E, Cruz E, Espino A, Battad Z, Reyes R, Orden M, et al. Pelletized forage-based rations as alternative feeds for improving goat productivity. Trop Grasslands. 2013;2(1):108-10. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(2)108-110
Rashid M, Khan M, Khandoker M, Akbar M, Alam M. Feeding different levels of energy and crude protein in compound pellet and performance of Black Bengal goat. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci. 2016;9(5):2319-372. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0905012329
Ojo V, Oyaniran D, Adewumi O, Adeyemi T, Muraina T. Comparative studies on the yield of some herbaceous legumes and effects of storage on the quality of their pellets. Niger J Anim Prod. 2018;45(1):296-308. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v45i1.375
Patil PV, Gendley MK, Dubey M, Dhok AP, Gade NE, Khune VN. Effect of feeding gram straw-based complete feed pellets on the performance, nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation of goats. Asian J Dairy Food Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.DR-2031

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-04-2025 (2)
- 26-03-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vinodhini S M, Sivakumar S D, Ramesh T, Pushpam R, Surendrakumar A, Raghavendran V B, Rathika S, Vijayaprabhakar A

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).