Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Farmers’ awareness on bio inputs in coconut cultivation based on education in Thondamuthur block of Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6022
Submitted
21 October 2024
Published
07-02-2025 — Updated on 13-02-2025
Versions

Abstract

This study investigated farmers’ awareness and use of bio-inputs in coconut farming in Thondamuthur block, Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Given agriculture's significance in India’s economy, bio-inputs are an alternative to chemical fertilizers amidst population increase and climate change. The study evaluates the level of awareness amongst farmers, factors that influence the buying behaviour of bio-inputs like bio-fertilizers and bio-pesticides and constraints to their use. Statistical analysis included percentage analysis, Chi-square test and factor analysis on data from 140 respondents. Factors like yield, price, experience, knowledge and government subsidies influenced buying behaviour mainly. The findings revealed that although farmers are aware of bio-inputs, constraints such as availability, poor government support and quality concerns limit their utilization. The paper emphasized that given these constraints, there is a need for more policy support as well as training programs to enhance bio-input utilization in sustainable agriculture in the study area.

References

  1. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2023). Gross Value Added by Economic Activity. MOSPI. https://www.mospi.gov.in/
  2. Acharya Balkrishna AK, Arya V, Sharma G, Srivastava D, Sharma A, Khan N. Situational analysis of government initiatives for the welfare of farmers in India: impact and futuristic insights. Indian Journal of Ecology. 2022;49(3):1023-35.
  3. Al Abboud M, Ghany TA, Alawlaqi M. Role of biofertilizers in agriculture: a brief review. Mycopath. 2014;11(2).
  4. Kumar J, Ramlal A, Mallick D, Mishra V. An overview of some biopesticides and their importance in plant protection for commercial acceptance. Plants. 2021;10(6):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061185
  5. Thomas GV, Krishnakumar V, Dhanapal R, Srinivasa Reddy D. Agro-management practices for sustainable coconut production. The coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.) -research and development perspectives. 2018:227-322.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2754-4_7
  6. Keller G. Statistics for management and economics: Cengage Learning; 2018.
  7. Walsh G, Mitchell VW. Demographic characteristics of consumers who find it difficult to decide. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2005;23(3):281-95.https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500510597319
  8. Agresti A. Statistical methods for the social sciences: Pearson; 2018.
  9. Eba N, Bashargo G. Factors affecting adoption of chemical fertilizer by smallholder farmers in Guto Gida district, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 2014;3(2):237-44.https://doi.org/10.4314/star.v3i2.31
  10. Wang P, Liu Q, Qi Y. Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;63:152-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.007
  11. Zakir S. Case of poultry industry. Published MBA thesis, Department of Agribusiness management, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. 2008.
  12. Buragohain D, Dubey J. Contract farming: A constraint study using Garrett ranking technique. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 2021;57(2):212-15. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-552X.2021.00055.4
  13. Khan D, Tare U. Sustainable agripreneurship: Integrating environmental and economic perspectives in Indian agriculture. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR). 2024;11(1):32-42.
  14. Freedman DA, Vaudrin N, Schneider C, Trapl E, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Taggart M, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing farmers’ market use overall and among low-income populations. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2016;116(7):1136-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.02.010
  15. Nyairo NM. Attitudes and perceptions of smallholder farmers towards agricultural technologies in western Kenya: Purdue University; 2020.
  16. Deveshwar A, Panwar S. Overview of agricultural subsidies in india and its impact on environment. Current World Environment. 2024;19(1):393. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.19.1.33
  17. Zerssa G, Feyssa D, Kim DG, Eichler-Löbermann B. Challenges of smallholder farming in Ethiopia and opportunities by adopting climate-smart agriculture. Agriculture. 2021;11(3):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030192
  18. Mokgomo MN, Chagwiza C, Tshilowa PF. The impact of government agricultural development support on agricultural income, production and food security of beneficiary small-scale farmers in South Africa. Agriculture. 2022;12(11):1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111760
  19. Martey E, Etwire PM, Adogoba DS, Tengey TK. Farmers’ preferences for climate-smart cowpea varieties: Implications for crop breeding programmes. Climate and Development. 2022;14(2):105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1889949

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.