Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Optimization of irrigation and fertigation schedule for the sugarcane variety cog 7 under sustainable sugarcane initiative technique

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7498
Submitted
29 January 2025
Published
11-12-2025

Abstract

Sugarcane requires adequate water and nutrients for growth and development to produce profitable productivity. Providing optimum water during the growth period increases cane yield through the effective utilization of nutrients. Subsurface drip irrigation is designed to supply the required moisture to the root zone. Sustainable sugarcane initiative under subsurface drip irrigation is gaining importance because of the benefits of water and nutrient use efficiencies. However, varietal or location-specific optimization of moisture and nutrient requirements is warranted to enhance productivity in an ecosystem. Therefore, field experiments in split plot design were conducted at Sugarcane Research Station, Melalathur, Vellore district (Northwestern zone of Tamil Nadu) to optimize suitable irrigation regime and fertilizer levels for the sugarcane variety CoG 7 under the sustainable sugarcane initiative approach. Irrigation regimes in the main plot and nutrient levels in subplots were imposed. The main plot comprised of four irrigation regimes I1: Subsurface drip at 75 % PE - Irrigation once in two days; I2: Subsurface drip at 100 % PE - Irrigation once in two days; I3: Farmers practice – surface irrigation and subplot consist of N1: 100 % of recommended dose of NPK ha-1 through water-soluble, N2: 125 % of recommended dose of NPK ha-1 through water soluble, N3: 100 % of recommended dose of NPK ha-1 through urea, super phosphate and MOP and N4: 125 % of recommended dose of NPKha-1 through urea, super and MOP. These treatments were replicated thrice. The experiments were conducted for 6 years. The combined result revealed that sub-surface drip irrigation at 100 % PE once in two days and application of 125 % of RDF of NPK ha-1 through water soluble fertilizers recorded the highest cane yield. 

References

  1. 1. Dalin C, Wada Y, Kastner T, Puma MJ. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature. 2017;543:700–04. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature21403
  2. 2. Sudhagar R, Saravanan NA, Kanchanaran R, Shanmuganathan M, Ganapathy S, Babu C et al. Evolution, identification, evaluation and characterization of a stable salinity tolerant sugarcane variety CoG 7. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:20448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70756-1
  3. 3. Abbasi F, sheini-dashtegol A. Evaluation and management improvement of furrow irrigation in Khuzestan sugarcane fields. Water and Soil Science Journal. 2016;26(2):109-21.
  4. 4. Appels WM, Karimi R. Analysis of soil wetting patterns in subsurface drip irrigation systems – Indoor Alfalfa experiments. Agricultural Water Management. 2021;250:10683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106832
  5. 5. Wang X, Fan J, Xing Y, Xu G, Wang H, Deng J, et al. The effects of mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil environment of crop plants. Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press. 2019;121-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.08.003
  6. 6. Wang WH, Quan NH, Zhang F, Fan J, Feng H, Cheng M, et al. Yield and water productivity of crops, vegetables and fruits under subsurface drip irrigation: A global meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management. 2022;269:107645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022: 269:107645
  7. 7. Mahmoudi M, Khelil MN, Hechmi S, Latrech B, Ghrib R, Boujlben A, et al. Effect of surface and subsurface drip irrigation with treated wastewater on soil and water productivity of Okra (Abemoschus esculentus) crop in semi-arid region of Tunisia. Agriculture. 2022;2:2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122048
  8. 8. Mahesh R, Raja NA, Archana HA. Performance of surface and subsurface drip fertigation on yield and water use efficiency of sugarcane. 2nd World Irrigation Forum. Chiang Mai, Thailand. 2016:1-10.
  9. 9. Manikandan M, Thiyagarajan G, Thenmozhi S, Natarajan SK, Bhuvaneshwar J, Prabakaran NK. Optimization of irrigation and fertigation scheduling for Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) through subsurface drip irrigation in western zone of Tamil Nadu. Current Agricultural Research Journal. 2019;7:1. http://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.1.14
  10. 10. Sudhagar R, Rajkumar S, Ramachandiran K, Saravanan NA. Identification of location-specific male and female sugarcane parents and formulation of breeding strategies. Sugar Tech. 2023;25(3):670–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01225-0
  11. 11. Padmanabhan M, Nagaraju N, Sheshadri T, Gowda MN, Raju BM, Channabasavegowda R. Effect of duration and levels of subsurface drip fertigation on yield and yield parameters of sugarcane. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2015;50(2): 297-300.
  12. 12. Chen JCP, Chi CC. Cane sugar handbook: A Manual for Cane Sugar Manufacturers and Their Chemists. John Wiley & Sons. 1993.
  13. 13. Whalley HCS. Editor. ICUMSA Methods of sugar analysis official and tentative methods recommended by the International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis (ICUMSA). Elsevier (London). 1964:420.
  14. 14. Meade GP, Chen JCP. Cane sugar Hand Book.10th ed. New York: John Wiley and Son. Inc.1977:947.
  15. 15. Uribe RA, Gava GJ, Saad JC, Kölln OT. Ratoon sugarcane yield integrated drip-irrigation and nitrogen fertilization. Engenharia Agricola. 2013;33:1124-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162013000600005
  16. 16. Soliman AI, Morad MM, Wasfy KI, Moursy MA. Utilization of aquaculture drainage for enhancing onion crop yield under surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;239:106244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106244
  17. 17. Van-heerden PD, Donaldson RA, Watt DA, Singels A. Biomass accumulation in sugarcane: unraveling the factors underpinning reduced growth phenomena. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2010;61(11):2877-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq144
  18. 18. Dinh TH, Watanable K, Takaragawa H, Nakabaru M, Kawamitsu Y. Photosynthetic response and nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane under drought stress conditions with different nitrogen application levels. Plant Production Science. 2017;20(4):412-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2017.1371570
  19. 19. Navitkumar NK, Rakesh kumar RK, Sinha UP. Dry matter accumulation pattern and sugar yield of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) as influenced by phosphorus and sulphur nutrition. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology. 2010;25:5-8.
  20. 20. Simões MD, Rocha JV, Lamparelli RA. Growth indices and productivity in sugarcane. Scientia Agricola. 2005;62(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162005000100005
  21. 21. Iqbal R, Raza MA, Valipour M, Saleem MF, Zaheer MS, Ahmad S, et al. Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches- A review. Bulletin National Research Centre. 2020;44:1-6. https://doi.org/75.10.1186/s42269-020-00290-3
  22. 22. Sourabh M, Shashidhara GB, Alagundagi SC, Bidari BI, Meti CB. Effect of drip fertigation levels on nutrient uptake and post-harvest available nutriment status of adsali sugarcane. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2021;10(12):2763-67.
  23. 23. Pires RCM, Barbosa EEA, Arruda FB, Silva TJA, Sakai E, Landell MGA. Subsurface drip irrigation in different planting spacing of sugarcane. Geophysical Research Abstracts. 2015;14:6767-1.
  24. 24. Ali Sheini Dashtegol. Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on water productivity and yield of sugarcane in southwest of Iran. Nature and Science. 2020;18(8):45-55. https://doi.org/ 10.7537/marsnsj180820.07
  25. 25. Sathiyaraj M, Sathyapriya. Irrigation regimes and fertigation levels on sugarcane under subsurface drip fertigation. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 2017;6(11):3674-84. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.430
  26. 26. De Castro SG, Magalhaes PS, De Castro SA, Koliln OT, Franco HC. Optimising nitrogen fertilizer rates at distinct in season application moments in sugarcane. International Journal of Plant Production. 2022:16(1):137-52.
  27. 27. Wiedenfeld B, Enciso J. Sugarcane responses to irrigation and nitrogen in semiarid south Texas. Agronomy Journal. 2008;100:665-71. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0286
  28. 28. Ali HI, Ahmad S, Hussain, M. Irfan A, Areeb RN, Shabir. Basal application of potassium nutrition enhances cane yield, juice quality and net returns of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Pakisthan Journal of Agricultural Science. 2018;55:312-29.
  29. 29. Saleem MF, Ghaffar A, Anjum SA, Cheema MA, Bilal MF. Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sugarcane. Journal American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. 2012;32:75-93.
  30. 30. Hajari E, Snyman SJ, Watt MP. Nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) varieties under in vitro conditions with varied N supply. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2015;122:21-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0746-y
  31. 31. Hussain F, Sarwar MA, Ali MA, Fiaz N, Ghaffar A, Chattha AA. Impact of balanced fertilization along with time of phosphorus and potassium application on yield and quality of sugarcane. International Journal of Agriculture and Applied Science. 2010;2(2):1-6.
  32. 32. Chattha MU, Hassan MU, Khan I, Chattha MB, Munir H, Nawaz M, et al. Alternate skip irrigation strategy ensure sustainable sugarcane yield. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. 2017;27(5).
  33. 33. Nawaz M, Chattha MU, Chattha MB, Ahmad R, Munir H, Usman M, et al. Assessment of compost as nutrient supplement for spring planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. 2017;27(1).
  34. 34. Inman-Bamber NG, Bonnett GD, Spillman MF, Hewitt ML, Jackson J. Increasing sucrose accumulation in sugarcane by manipulating leaf extension and photosynthesis with irrigation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008;59(1):13-26. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07167
  35. 35. Pereira LF, Ferreira VM, Oliveira NG, Sarmento PL, Endres L, Teodoro I. Sugars levels of four sugarcane genotypes in different stem portions during the maturation phase. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2017;89:1231-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160594

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.