Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Guiding farmers in choosing the right farmer organization: A systematic approach

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7995
Submitted
28 February 2025
Published
26-08-2025 — Updated on 23-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

The emergence of farmers organizations is helpful valuable institutional mechanism for small and medium farmers that has attracted increasing attention from researchers and policymakers. The review examines the existing literatures on farmer organizations to provide clear guidance for farmers to select the most suitable organizational structures. This review analyses various types of farmer organizations such as Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), cooperatives, self-help groups (SHGs), commodity-based associations and contract farming partnerships, examining their characteristics and benefits. It also identifies key factors that farmers should consider when choosing an organization, such as economic benefits, access to resources and services, governance structures, social capital and sustainability. This paper presents a systematic decision-making framework to help farmers evaluate and select organizations that align with their needs and goals. The analysis also highlights significant challenges faced by different types of farmers organizations, such as financial constraints, governance issues, low member participation, market access difficulties and environmental factors. This also focuses the role of digital tools and technology in strengthening farmers organizations, particularly in areas of market access, governance and financial services. Finally, this also identifies critical research gaps in longitudinal sustainability studies, technology adoption, gender dynamics, member participation and policy frameworks. This comprehensive analysis aims to assist farmers in making informed decisions when joining farmer organizations and offers insights for researchers and policymakers to enhance the effectiveness of farmer organizations in promoting agricultural sustainability and rural development.

References

  1. 1. Hellin J, Lundy M, Meijer M. Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy. 2009;34(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.003
  2. 2. Bernard T, Spielman DJ. Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food Policy. 2009;34(1):60–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.08.001
  3. 3. Barrett S. The incredible economics of geoengineering. Environ Resour Econ. 2008;39:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9174-8
  4. 4. Markelova H, Meinzen-Dick R, Hellin J, Dohrn S. Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy. 2009;34(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001
  5. 5. Francesconi GN, Heerink N. Ethiopian agricultural cooperatives in an era of global commodity exchange: does organisational form matter?. J Afr Econ. 2011;20(1):153–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejq036
  6. 6. Trebbin A, Hassler M. Farmers' producer companies in India: a new concept for collective action?. Environ Plan A. 2012;44(2):411–27. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44143
  7. 7. Kumar S, Kumar R, Meena PC, Kumar A. Determinants of performance and constraints faced by Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) in India. Indian J Extension Education. 2023;59(2):1–5. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59201
  8. 8. Marbaniang EK, Chauhan JK, Kharumnuid P. Farmer Producer Organization (FPO): the need of the hour. AGRICULTURE & FOOD: e-Newsletter. 2019;2581–8317.
  9. 9. Birchall J, Simmons R. What motivates members to participate in co‐operative and mutual businesses?. Ann Public Cooperative Econ. 2004;75(3):465–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00259.x
  10. 10. Wanyama FO, Develtere P, Pollet I. Reinventing the wheel? African cooperatives in a liberalized economic environment. Ann Public Cooperative Econ. 2009;80(3):361–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00390.x
  11. 11. Verhofstadt E, Maertens M. Smallholder cooperatives and agricultural performance in Rwanda: do organizational differences matter?. Agric Econ. 2014;45(S1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12128
  12. 12. Nair TS, Tankha A. Inclusive finance India report 2014. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  13. 13. Kadiyala S. Scaling up Kudumbashree-collective action for poverty alleviation and women's empowerment. 2004.
  14. 14. Schneider K, Gugerty MK. Gender and contract farming in sub-Saharan Africa-Literature review. Seattle: Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington; 2010.
  15. 15. Fischer E, Qaim M. Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Dev. 2012;40(6):1255–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018
  16. 16. Silva CD. The growing role of contract farming in agri-food systems development: drivers, theory and practice. 2005;30.
  17. 17. Bellemare MF, Bloem JR. Does contract farming improve welfare? A review. World Dev. 2018;112:259–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.018
  18. 18. Key N, Roberts MJ. Nonpecuniary benefits to farming: implications for supply response to decoupled payments. Am J Agric Econ. 2009;91(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01180.x
  19. 19. Roy D, Thorat A. Success in high value horticultural export markets for the small farmers: the case of Mahagrapes in India. World Dev. 2008;36(10):1874–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.009
  20. 20. Lei X, Yang D. An analysis of the impact of digital technology adoption on the income of high quality farmers in production and operating. PloS One. 2024;19(9):e0309675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309675
  21. 21. Dorward A, Kydd J, Morrison J, Urey I. A policy agenda for pro-poor agricultural growth. World Dev. 2004;32(1):73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.012
  22. 22. Moustier P, Tam PT, Anh DT, Binh VT, Loc NT. The role of farmer organizations in supplying supermarkets with quality food in Vietnam. Food Policy. 2010;35(1):69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.08.003
  23. 23. Kaganzi E, Ferris S, Barham J, Abenakyo A, Sanginga P, Njuki J. Sustaining linkages to high value markets through collective action in Uganda. Food Policy. 2009;34(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.004
  24. 24. Chaddad FR, Cook ML. Understanding new cooperative models: an ownership-control rights typology. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2004;26(3):348–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00184.x
  25. 25. Woolcock M, Narayan D. Capital social: implicaciones para la teoría, la investigación y las políticas sobre desarrollo. World Bank Res Obs. 2000;15(2):225–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
  26. 26. Bockstaller C, Girardin P, van der Werf HM. Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems. Dev Crop Sci. 1997;25:329–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-519X(97)80032-3
  27. 27. Pretty J. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1491):447–65. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
  28. 28. Mazzucato M, Parris S. High-growth firms in changing competitive environments: the US pharmaceutical industry (1963 to 2002). Small Bus Econ. 2015;44(1):145–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9583-3
  29. 29. Cheng C, Gao Q, Ju K, Ma Y. How digital skills affect farmers’ agricultural entrepreneurship? An explanation from factor availability. J Innov Knowledge. 2024;9(2):100477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100477
  30. 30. Getnet K, Anullo T. Agricultural cooperatives and rural livelihoods: evidence from Ethiopia. Ann Public Cooperative Econ. 2012;83(2):181–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00460.x
  31. 31. Mwangi LW, Makau MS, Kosimbei G. Relationship between capital structure and performance of non-financial companies listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Glob J Contemp Res Account Audit Bus Ethics. 2014;1(2):72–90. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajf.125
  32. 32. Latynskiy E, Berger T. Networks of rural producer organizations in Uganda: what can be done to make them work better?. World Dev. 2016;78:572–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.014
  33. 33. Michalek J, Ciaian P. Capitalization of the single payment scheme into land value: generalized propensity score evidence from the European Union. Land Econ. 2014;90(2):260–89. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.2.260
  34. 34. Chirwa EW. Adoption of fertiliser and hybrid seeds by smallholder maize farmers in Southern Malawi. Dev South Afr. 2005;22(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350500044065
  35. 35. Mazzucato M. Mission-oriented innovation policy: challenges and opportunities. London: Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose; 2017.
  36. 36. Smidt HJ, Jokonya O. Factors affecting digital technology adoption by small-scale farmers in agriculture value chains (AVCs) in South Africa. Inf Technol Dev. 2022;28(3):558–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1975256
  37. 37. Kilelu CW. Unravelling the role of innovation intermediaries in smallholder agricultural development: case studies from Kenya. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research; 2013.
  38. 38. Reardon T, Timmer CP. The economics of the food system revolution. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2012;4(1):225–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144147
  39. 39. Choruma DJ, Dirwai TL, Mutenje M, Mustafa M, Chimonyo VG, Jacobs-Mata I, et al. Digitalisation in agriculture: a scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges and opportunities for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. J Agric Food Res. 2024;101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286
  40. 40. Birner R, Davis K, Pender J, Nkonya E, Anandajayasekeram P, Ekboir J, et al. From best practice to best fit: a framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. J Agric Educ Ext. 2009;15(4):341–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240903309595
  41. 41. Misaki E, Apiola M, Gaiani S, Tedre M. Challenges facing sub‐Saharan small‐scale farmers in accessing farming information through mobile phones: a systematic literature review. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2018;84(4):e12034. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12034
  42. 42. Goyal A. Information, direct access to farmers and rural market performance in central India. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2010;2(3):22–45. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.3.22
  43. 43. Finger R. Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2023;50(4):1277–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021
  44. 44. Mana AA, Allouhi A, Hamrani A, Rehman S, El Jamaoui I, Jayachandran K. Sustainable AI-based production agriculture: exploring AI applications and implications in agricultural practices. Smart Agric Technol. 2024;7:100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100416
  45. 45. Aijaz N, Lan H, Raza T, Yaqub M, Iqbal R, Pathan MS. Artificial intelligence in agriculture: advancing crop productivity and sustainability. J Agric Food Res. 2025;101762.
  46. 46. Ganne E. Can Blockchain revolutionize international trade?. Geneva: World Trade Organization; 2018:152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101762
  47. 47. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). E-agriculture in action: blockchain for agriculture - opportunities and challenges. Bangkok: FAO and International Telecommunication Union. 2019:66. https://www.fao.org/3/ca2906en/CA2906EN.pdf
  48. 48. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Digital agriculture report: rural e-commerce development - experience and best practices. Rome: FAO and ITU. 2021:46–7. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/044e20f8-3299-4eca-b92f-824850955092
  49. 49. Talaviya T, Shah D, Patel N, Yagnik H, Shah M. Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. Artif Intell Agric. 2020;4:58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002
  50. 50. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Empowering women in agriculture: reducing gender gaps through digital innovation. Rome: FAO. 2021:11–7. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/fcba7499-1285-43f1-89b2-a7fef24500f4/content
  51. 51. Fabregas R, Kremer M, Schilbach F. Realizing the potential of digital development: the case of agricultural advice. Sci. 2019;366(6471):eaay3038. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3038

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.