Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

From microbes to mighty crops: Enhancing soil health and drought tolerance with protein-based EPS biostimulant

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8712
Submitted
6 April 2025
Published
17-12-2025

Abstract

The objective of this study is to create a biostimulant formulation that will improve soil health and drought tolerance by utilizing plant-derived protein hydrolysates (PHs) and bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS). EPS were selected for their potential to enhance soil structure and water retention, while protein hydrolysates were included for their plant growth-promoting properties. This research focuses on EPS extraction from microbial sources and protein hydrolysate preparation, culminating in a combined biostimulant product tested for agricultural efficacy. Bacillus altitudinis A1 produced the highest EPS of 70.0 g L-1 after 14 days of incubation in Sabouraud Agar Base (SAB) medium among the four cultures evaluated. Since soymeal was identified earlier as having higher protein content, extraction was conducted and the yield was determined to be 43.8 % crude protein, which resulted in 8.6 mg g-1 total amino acids upon hydrolysis with papain enzyme. Soil incubation studies conducted with two types of soils viz. sandy loam and clay soils, demonstrated the potential of the EPS based biostimulant in improving physical properties such as pore space, bulk density and water holding capacity. Further this study investigated the effect of the biostimulant on seedling vigor of green gram (Vigna radiata) under varying osmotic stress levels ranging from -3 bar to -6 bar induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG). Based on the results, EPS biostimulant performed best in terms of the seedlings' growth and vigor, indicating that it should be used in water-limiting settings to lessen the stress on plant performance. An increase in early vigour of the plants will be helpful for the plants to perform better in the field. The GC-MS analysis of extracted bacterial EPS showed the presence of different types of decanoic acids, indicating potential for biocontrol. The FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) spectrum of EPS revealed the presence of C-H, C=O and O-H stretches. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of EPS-based biostimulants as a sustainable solution to enhance drought resilience in crops, with future research needed to explore long-term effects and to optimize for large-scale applications.

References

  1. 1. Capps R, Castaneda RM, Chaudry A, Santos R. Paying the price: the impact of immigration raids on America’s children. Washington (DC): National Council of La Raza. 2007.
  2. 2. Ahmed T, Noman M, Manzoor N, Shahid M, Abdullah M, Ali L, et al. Nanoparticle-based amelioration of drought stress and cadmium toxicity in rice via triggering the stress-responsive genetic mechanisms and nutrient acquisition. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;209:111829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111829
  3. 3. Bibi A, Xiong Y, Rajoka MS, Mehwish HM, Radicetti E, Umair M, et al. Recent advances in the production of exopolysaccharide (EPS) from Lactobacillus spp. and its application in the food industry: a review. Sustainability. 2021;13(22):12429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212429
  4. 4. Paul S, Parvez SS, Goswami A, Banik A. Exopolysaccharides from agriculturally important microorganisms: conferring soil nutrient status and plant health. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;262:129954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129954
  5. 5. Alami Y, Champolivier L, Merrien A, Heulin T. The role of Rhizobium sp., a rhizobacterium that produces exopolysaccharide, in the aggregation of the rhizospheric soil of sunflower: Effects on plant growth and resistance to hydric constraints. Oleagineux Corps Gras Lipides. 2000;6:524–8.
  6. 6. Colla G, Nardi S, Cardarelli M, Ertani A, Lucini L, Canaguier R, et al. Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.037
  7. 7. Bhat ZF, Kumar S, Bhat HF. Bioactive peptides of animal origin: A review. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(9):5377-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1731-5
  8. 8. Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, et al. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
  9. 9. Gupta A, Thakur IS. Optimization of wastewater contaminant removal along with EPS production by thermotolerant Bacillus sp. ISTVK1 isolated from heat-shocked sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2016;213:21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.040
  10. 10. Gomathi D, Kalaiselvi M, Ravikumar G, Devaki K, Uma C. GC-MS analysis of bioactive compounds from the whole plant ethanolic extract of Evolvulus alsinoides (L.) L. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(2):1212-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1105-9
  11. 11. Sivasankari R, Hemalatha G, Amutha S, Murugan M, Vanniarajan C, Uma Maheswari T. Extraction of protein concentrates from faba beans. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7:3430-4.
  12. 12. Moghannem SA, Farag MM, Shehab AM, Azab MS. Exopolysaccharide production from Bacillus velezensis KY471306 using statistical experimental design. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49(3):452-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.012
  13. 13. Anantha PS, Deventhiran M, Saravanan P, Anand D, Rajarajan S. Comparative GC-MS analysis of bacterial secondary metabolites of Pseudomonas species. Pharma Innov J. 2016;5(4B):84.
  14. 14. Negi R, Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, Yadav AN. Nitrogen-fixing endophytic and mineral-solubilizing rhizobacteria as multifunctional microbial consortium for growth promotion of wheat and Aegilops kotschyi. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12579
  15. 15. Shultana R, Kee Zuan AT, Yusop MR, Saud HM. Characterization of salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their effect on saline-affected rice. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238537
  16. 16. Verhoef R, Schols HA, Blanco A, Siika-aho M, Rättö M, Buchert J, et al. Sugar composition and FT-IR analysis of exopolysaccharides from microbial isolates of paper mill slime deposits. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;91(1):91-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20494
  17. 17. Agustin V, Husni A, Putra MM. Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysate from snakehead fish (Channa striata) viscera obtained by enzymatic process. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;919:012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/919/1/012046
  18. 18. Colla G, Rouphael Y, Canaguier R, Svecova E, Cardarelli M. Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate obtained through enzymatic hydrolysis. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00448
  19. 19. Fitriyah F, Kresnawaty I, Santoso D. Protein hydrolysates enhance germination and early growth of maize and sugarcane. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2022;974:012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/974/1/012066
  20. 20. Kaushal M. Portraying rhizobacterial mechanisms in drought tolerance: A way forward toward sustainable agriculture. In: Singh AK, Kumar A, Singh PK, editors. PGPR Amelioration in Sustainable Agriculture. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. 2019. p.195-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815879-1.00010-0
  21. 21. Sandhya VZ, ZA SK, Grover M, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu BS. Alleviation of drought stress in sunflower seedlings by exopolysaccharide-producing Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45. Biol Fertil Soils. 2009;46(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0401-z
  22. 22. Colla G, Hoagland L, Ruzzi M, Cardarelli M, Bonini P, Canaguier R, et al. Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02202
  23. 23. Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, et al. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
  24. 24. Deng J, Orner EP, Chau JF, Anderson EM, Kadilak AL, Rubinstein RL, et al. Synergistic effects of soil microstructure and bacterial EPS on drying rate in emulated soil micromodels. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;83:116-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.12.006
  25. 25. Obia A, Mulder J, Martinsen V, Cornelissen G, Borresen T. In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res. 2016;155:35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.08.002
  26. 26. Naseem H, Ahsan M, Shahid MA, Khan N. Exopolysaccharide-producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance. J Basic Microbiol. 2018;58(12):1009-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800309
  27. 27. Masondo NA, Kulkarni MG, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Influence of biostimulant seed-priming on Ceratotheca triloba germination and seedling growth under stress conditions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;147:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.017

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.