Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Growth and nutrient uptake of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by varied rate of potassium humate foliar application

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8778
Submitted
9 April 2025
Published
04-02-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of 2021-22 at the Agronomy Main Research Farm, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, to evaluate the effect of different rates of potassium humate foliar application on rice growth and nutrient uptake. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with nine treatment combinations and three replications. The findings demonstrated that foliar application of potassium humate @ 3 g L-1 at tillering and panicle initiation (PI) stages (T7) significantly enhanced plant height (121.8 cm), tiller density (437.8 tillers m-2), dry matter accumulation (1079.11 g m-2), LAI (4.41), crop growth rate (18.18 g m-2 day-1), relative growth rate (40.82 mg g-1 day-1), grain yield (5234 kg ha-1) and nutrient uptake compared to other treatments. However, it was statistically at par with T9 (potassium humate @ 4 g L-1 at tillering and PI stage) and T5 (potassium humate @ 2 g L-1 at tillering and PI stage), indicating a saturation effect beyond a certain dosage. This suggests that an optimal dose of potassium humate can enhance crop performance, supporting its potential use as a biostimulant for improving rice productivity under field conditions.

References

  1. 1. Bin Rahman AR, Zhang J. Trends in rice research: 2030 and beyond. Food and Energy Security. 2023;12(2):e390. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.390
  2. 2. Government of India. Economic Survey 2023-2024: Statistical Appendix. New Delhi: Government of India; 2023. p. 37-41.
  3. 3. Pathak H, Tripathi R, Jambhulkar NN, Bisen JP, Panda BB. Eco-regional rice farming for enhancing productivity, profitability and sustainability. NRRI Research Bulletin No. 22. Cuttack: ICAR-National Rice Research Institute; 2020. p. 28.
  4. 4. Hayes MHB, Swift RS. Vindication of humic substances as a key component of organic matter in soil and water. Advances in Agronomy. 2020;162:1-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2020.05.001
  5. 5. Lamar RT, Gralian J, Hockaday WC, Jerzykiewicz M, Monda H. Investigation into the role of carboxylic acid and phenolic hydroxyl groups in the plant biostimulant activity of a humic acid purified from an oxidized sub-bituminous coal. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1328006
  6. 6. Ampong K, Thilakarathna MS, Gorim LY. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2022;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.848621
  7. 7. Nardi S, Schiavon M, Francioso O. Chemical structure and biological activity of humic substances define their role as plant growth promoters. Molecules. 2021;26(8):2256. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082256
  8. 8. Kumar D, Singh AP, Kumar A. Nutrient uptake and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by coal-derived potassium humate and chemical fertilizers. Oryza. 2017;54(2):200-7. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5266.2017.00026.1
  9. 9. Souza AC, Olivares FL, Peres LEP, Piccolo A, Canellas LP. Plant hormone crosstalk mediated by humic acids. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2022;9:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-022-00295-2
  10. 10. Hassan A, Ullah A, Hammad, Jan Z, Zakirullah, Khan A, et al. Effect of humic acid and bread yeast application on the vegetative, yield and qualitative attributes of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Pure and Applied Biology. 2023;12:677-82. http://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2023.120069
  11. 11. Nunes RO, Domiciano GA, Alves WS, Melo ACA, Nogueira FCS, Canellas LP, et al. Evaluation of the effects of humic acids on maize root architecture by label-free proteomics analysis. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:12019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48509-2
  12. 12. Weerasekara I, Sinniah UR, Namasivayam P, Nazli MH, Abdurahman SA, Ghazali MN. Priming with humic acid to reverse ageing damage in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill.) seeds. Agriculture. 2021;11(10):966. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100966
  13. 13. Li Y, Fang F, Wei J, Wu X, Cui R, Li G, et al. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: a three-year experiment. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:12014. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48620-4
  14. 14. Rui R, Hei J, Li Y, Farraj DAA, Noor F, Wang S, et al. Effects of humic acid fertilizer on the growth and microbial network stability of Panax notoginseng from the forest understorey. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:17816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68949-9
  15. 15. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Perntice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973. p. 41-8.
  16. 16. Walkley A, Black CA. Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 1934;37:29-38.
  17. 17. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973. p. 234-50.
  18. 18. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science. 1956;28(8):259-60.
  19. 19. Bray RH, Kurtz IT. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science. 1945;59:39-46.
  20. 20. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; 1973. p. 115-8.
  21. 21. Watson DJ. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances of Agronomy. 1952;4:101-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60307-7
  22. 22. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984. p. 680.
  23. 23. Mohammed MH, Abd-Alrahman HA, Abdel-Kader HH, Aboud FS. Effect of potassium humate and levels of potassium fertilization on growth, yield and nutritional status of tomato plants. Journal of Horticultural Science and Ornamental Plants. 2021;13(2):124-33. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.jhsop.2021.124.133
  24. 24. Shen J, Xiao X, Zhong D, Lian H. Potassium humate supplementation improves photosynthesis and agronomic and yield traits of foxtail millet. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:9508. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-16897-6
  25. 25. Basha DMA, Hellal F, El-Sayed S. The combined effect of potassium humate and bio-fertilizers on maize productivity and quality under water stress conditions. Science Archives. 2021;2(3):162-70. https://doi.org/10.47587/SA.2021.2305
  26. 26. Izhar Shafi M, Adnan M, Fahad S, Wahid F, Khan A, Yue Z, et al. Application of single superphosphate with humic acid improves the growth, yield and phosphorus uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in calcareous soil. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091224

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.