Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Performance of direct seeded rice (DSR) in relation to planting patterns and weed control methods on weed dynamics and productivity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8783
Submitted
9 April 2025
Published
13-02-2026

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the major significant staple food of Indian population. Compared to puddled transplanting, direct seeded rice (DSR) is environmentally friendly but faces severe weed infestation and iron deficiency, resulting in low yields and poor farmer adoption. To examine these problems, a field study was conducted using a Split-Plot Design at Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India during 2022 and 2023. Different planting patterns were kept in main plots were flat sowing, two rows per bed, three rows per bed and two rows per bed and one in furrow and sub plots treatments were “pendimethalin fb. bispyribac, pendimethalin fb. metsulfuron, weed free up to harvest and unweeded (control)”. Among the planting patterns, three rows per bed produced significantly higher paddy yield than flat sowing. This treatment was followed by two rows on bed and one in furrow. Also weed density was lower in all bed planting treatments as compared to flat sowing technique due to deep burial of weed seeds. Among weed control treatments, unweeded (control) resulted in more than 95 % yield loss compared with herbicidal treated plots. Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin fb. post-emergence application of bispyribac showed better performance on typical non-paddy and paddy weeds i.e., grasses, sedges and broad leafed weeds in DSR and resulted in higher yields over other weed control treatments but weed free upto harvest treatment was found at par to this treatment during both years.

References

  1. 1. Hashim M, Singh VK, Singh KK, Dhar S, Pandey UC. Weed management strategies in direct seeded rice: A review. Agric Rev. 2024;45(2):258-65. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2245
  2. 2. Center for Agriculture and Rural Development Policy Research (CARP). ANGRAU paddy outlook report 2023-24. https://angrau.ac.in/downloads/AMIC/OutlookReports/2023_24/paddy%20outlook-June-july-2023-24.pdf
  3. 3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Rome: FAO; 2020 [cited 2024 Sept 18]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize
  4. 4. Rao AN, Johnson DE, Sivaprasad B, Ladha JK, Mortimer AM. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv Agron. 2007;93:153-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1
  5. 5. Choubey NK, Kobe SS, Tripathi RS. Relative performance of cyhalofop butyl for weed control in direct seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2001;33:132-5.
  6. 6. Shyamsunder B, Walia US, Prasanna T, Menon S, Nawabpet P, Raju GSK, et al. Phytotoxicity of pendimethalin on the emergence of seedlings and microbial count in direct-seeded rice across different concentrations. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2024;18(2):1121-5. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.18.2.31
  7. 7. Ramzan M. Evaluation of various planting methods in rice-wheat cropping system, Punjab, Pakistan. Rice Crop Rep. 2003;4-5.
  8. 8. Remington TRJ, Posner L. On-farm evaluation of weed control technologies in direct-seeded rice in the Gambia. In: Starkey P, Simalenga T, editors. Animal power for weed control. Wageningen: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation; 2000.
  9. 9. Chauhan BS, Mahajan G, Sardana V, Timsina J, Jat ML. Productivity and sustainability of the rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of the Indian subcontinent: Problems, opportunities and strategies. Adv Agron. 2012;117:315-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00006-4
  10. 10. Reddy BS, Reddy SR. Soil, water and weed management for lowland rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron. 2000;45(2):327-33.
  11. 11. Baloch MS, Awan IU, Hassan G, Zubair M. Studies on plant population and stand establishment techniques for higher productivity of rice in Dera Ismail Khan. Rice Sci. 2007;14(2):118-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(07)60017-1
  12. 12. Dhillon BS, Mangat GS. Direct seeded rice in Punjab: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of national seminar on Sustainable Rice Production Technology for Increasing the Farmers’ Income. Raipur, Chhatisgarh: Indra Gandhi Krishi Vishav Vidyalaya; 2018. p. 20-21.
  13. 13. Basavalingaiah K, Ramesha YM, Paramesh V, Rajanna GA, Jat SL, Dhar Misra S, et al. Energy budgeting, data envelopment analysis and greenhouse gas emission from rice production system: A case study from puddled transplanted rice and direct-seeded rice system of Karnataka, India. Sustainability. 2020;12(16):6439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166439
  14. 14. Yadav S, Gill G, Humphreys E, Kukal S. Effect of water management on dry seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Part 1: Crop performance. Field Crops Res. 2011;120:112-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.002
  15. 15. Pooja K, Saravanane P. Performance of rice cultivars with weed management practices in dry direct-seeded rice. Ind J Weed Sci. 2021;53(1):92-4. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2021.00015.0
  16. 16. Singh V, Jat ML, Ganie ZA, Chauhan BS, Gupta RK. Herbicide options for effective weed management in dry direct-seeded rice under scented rice-wheat rotation of western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Crop Protect. 2016;81:168-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.12.021

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.