Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Screening of barnyard millet genotypes (Echinochloa frumentacea Roxb.) for seedling-stage salinity tolerance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9094
Submitted
25 April 2025
Published
04-02-2026

Abstract

Barnyard millet is an under-utilized minor millet, which shows more resilience to various abiotic stress. Salinity is one of the abiotic stresses, where the crop yield gets affected. This study was carried out in 2024 at Chengalpattu district of Tamil Nadu, where initial stress imposition is a major factor that allows us to understand the changes in root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight. Germination percentage and vigour index are the major parameters that were studied to screen the genotypes for salinity tolerance. The genotypes are subjected to sodium chloride treatment, to identify the tolerant genotypes. The treatments include control (without soaking), hydropriming, 50 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaCl, 150 mM NaCl and 200 mM NaCl, upon all the hundred genotypes. The differences in the performance of all the genotypes for each treatment were observed and recorded. Among the genotypes G34 (IEc 688), G25 (IEc 675), G18 (IEc154), G44 (IEc 360) and G43 (IEc 356) are found to be tolerant to salinity. The salinity tolerance in these genotypes has been exhibited due to cellular adjustment mechanisms and ionic balance that is achieved in the cytosol. This research provides insight into how varying salinity levels creates impact on the germination and vigour index of barnyard millet genotypes. The identification of salt-tolerant genotypes would potentially improve crop resilience in saline regions.

References

  1. 1. FAO. Global status of salt-affected soils – Main report. Rome; 2024. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd3044en
  2. 2. Hu D, Li R, Dong S, Zhang J, Zhao B, Ren B, et al. Maize (Zea mays L.) responses to salt stress in terms of root anatomy, respiration and antioxidative enzyme activity. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):602. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03972-4
  3. 3. Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian A, Thirumurugan T, Elangovan M, Kalaimagal T. Genetic variability and association studies in barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea (Roxb.) Link) germplasm under sodic soil condition. Electron J Plant Breed. 2019;10(2):430–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00055.3
  4. 4. Kuraloviya M, Vanniarajan C, Sudhagar R, Vetriventhan M. Phenotypic diversity and stability of early maturing barnyard millet (Echinochloa sp.) germplasm for grain yield and its contributing traits. Indian J Exp Biol. 2022;60(12):918–24. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijeb.v60i12.36064
  5. 5. Powell AA. Seed vigour in the 21st century. Seed Sci Technol. 2022;50(2):45–73. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2022.50.1.s.04
  6. 6. Williams G, Vanniarajan C, Vetriventhan M, Thiageshwari S, Anandhi K, Rajagopal B. Genetic variability for seedling stage salinity tolerance in barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentaceae (Roxb.) Link). Electron J Plant Breed. 2019;10(2):552–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00069.3
  7. 7. Singh R, Tariyal YS, Chauhan JS. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on salt stress tolerance of barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea). Biochem Anal Biochem. 2021;10(9):403.
  8. 8. Arthi N, Rajagopal B, Geethanjali S, Nirmalakumari A, Senthil N. Screening of barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea) germplasm for salinity tolerance. Electron J Plant Breed. 2019;10(2):659–66. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00083.8
  9. 9. Nedunchezhiyan V, Velusamy M, Subburamu K. Seed priming to mitigate the impact of elevated carbon dioxide associated temperature stress on germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2020;66(1):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1599864
  10. 10. Ardie SW, Khumaida N, Nur A, Fauziah N. Early identification of salt tolerant foxtail millet (Setaria italica L. Beauv). Proc Food Sci. 2015;3:303–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.01.033
  11. 11. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association; 2012.
  12. 12. Abdul Baki AA, Anderson JD. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 1973;13(6):630–3. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
  13. 13. Adhikari B, Dhital PR, Ranabhat S, Poudel H. Effect of seed hydro-priming durations on germination and seedling growth of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia). PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255258
  14. 14. Soujanya J, Bara BM, Rai PK, Pal AK. Impact of salinity on germination percentage and seedling growth in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. CSH–14. Biol Forum Int J 2022;14(4):198–202.
  15. 15. Lemmens E, Deleu LJ, De Brier N, De Man WL, De Proft M, Prinsen E, Delcour JA. The impact of hydro-priming and osmo-priming on seedling characteristics, plant hormone concentrations, activity of selected hydrolytic enzymes and cell wall and phytate hydrolysis in sprouted wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). ACS Omega. 2019;4(26):22089–100. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03210
  16. 16. Krishnamurthy L, Serraj R, Rai KN, Hash CT, Dakheel AJ. Identification of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] lines tolerant to soil salinity. Euphytica. 2007;158:179–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9441-3
  17. 17. Yakubu H, Ngala AL, Dugje IY. Screening of millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) varieties for salt tolerance in semi-arid soil of Northern Nigeria. World J Agric Sci. 2010;6(4):374–80.
  18. 18. Jha S, Singh J, Chouhan C, Singh O, Srivastava RK. Evaluation of multiple salinity tolerance indices for screening and comparative biochemical and molecular analysis of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] genotypes. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41(4):1820–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10424-0
  19. 19. Wu C, Zhang M, Liang Y, Zhang L, Diao X. Salt stress responses in foxtail millet: physiological and molecular regulation. Crop J. 2023;11(4):1011–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2023.06.001
  20. 20. Swarna R, Jinu J, Dheeraj C, Talwar HS. Salinity stress in pearl millet: from physiological to molecular responses. In: Pearl Millet in the 21st Century. Singapore: Springer; 2024. p. 361–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5890-0_14
  21. 21. Zhao C, Zhang H, Song C, Zhu JK, Shabala S. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The Innovation. 2020;1(1):100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100017
  22. 22. Abdel-Farid IB, Marghany MR, Rowezek MM, Sheded MG. Effect of salinity stress on growth and metabolomic profiling of Cucumis sativus and Solanum lycopersicum. Plants. 2020;9(11):1626. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111626
  23. 23. Subramanian A, Raj RN, Jeyaprakash P. In vitro and in vivo screening of barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea (Roxb.) Link) germplasm for salinity tolerance. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):7389–97.
  24. 24. Pradhan PP, Bhuyan P, Nag G, Sahoo JP. Genetic improvement of barnyard millet (Echinochloa esculenta): prospective and challenges. Technol Agron. 2024;4(1):e027. https://doi.org/10.48130/tia-0024-0024
  25. 25. Zuffo AM, Steiner F, Aguilera JG, Teodoro PE, Teodoro LP, Busch A. Multi-trait stability index: a tool for simultaneous selection of soya bean genotypes in drought and saline stress. J Agron Crop Sci. 2020;206(6):815–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12409
  26. 26. Vijayalakshmi D, Kishor Ashok S, Raveendran M. Screening for salinity stress tolerance in rice and finger millet genotypes using shoot Na+/K+ ratio and leaf carbohydrate contents as key physiological traits. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2014;19:156–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0090-y
  27. 27. Saha D, Choyal P, Mishra UN, Dey P, Bose B, Gupta NK, et al. Drought stress responses and inducing tolerance by seed priming approach in plants. Plant Stress. 2022;4:100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100066
  28. 28. Negrão S, Schmöckel SM, Tester MJ. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann Bot. 2017;119(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw191
  29. 29. El-Badri AM, Batool M, Wang C, Hashem AM, Tabl KM, Nishawy E, et al. Selenium and zinc oxide nanoparticles modulate molecular and morpho-physiological processes during seed germination of Brassica napus under salt stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;225:112695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112695
  30. 30. Saddiq MS, Iqbal S, Hafeez MB, Ibrahim AM, Raza A, Fatima EM, et al. Effect of salinity stress on physiological changes in winter and spring wheat. Agronomy. 2021;11(6):1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061193
  31. 31. Ashraf M. Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora. 2004;199(5):361–76. https://doi.org/10.1078/0367-2530-00165
  32. 32. Amoah JN, Adu-Gyamfi MO. Effect of drought acclimation on sugar metabolism in millet. Protoplasma. 2025;262(1):35–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-024-01976-5
  33. 33. Sehrawat A, Mann A, Sehrawat AR. Recent advances towards abiotic stresses tolerance and improvement in barnyard millet: a climate-resilient crop for food security. In: Cutting edge technologies for developing future crop plants. Singapore: Springer; 2025. p. 381–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2508-6_19
  34. 34. Samineni S, Gummadi S, Thushar S, Khan DN, Gkanogiannis A, Becerra Lopez-Lavalle LA, et al. Exploring proso millet resilience to abiotic stresses: high-yield potential in desert environments of the Middle East. Agronomy. 2025;15(1):165. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010165

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.