Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Evaluation of the competitive ability of four wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars with weeds and its effect on growth characteristics, yield and its components

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9147
Submitted
27 April 2025
Published
01-03-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Abu Ghraib Research Station during the 2022 and 2023 seasons using a split-plot experiment laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The study aimed to assess the competitive ability of four wheat cultivars (Buhuth 22, Buhuth 10, Baghdad and Ibaa 99) against weeds and their effects on growth traits, yield and its components. The experiment included four weed competition treatments: complete weed removal, removal of narrow-leaved weeds, removal of broad-leaved weeds and no weed removal. The results showed that weed removal improved all studied traits, with the weed-free treatment recording the highest plant height (92.0 cm), number of spikes (407.1 spikes m-2), 1000-grain weight (38.95 g) and grain yield (6.33 tons ha-1). In contrast, full weed competition led to a reduction in these values by up to 45 %. The Buhuth 22 cultivar outperformed others in most yield traits, recording the highest grain yield (5.52 tons ha-1), whereas Buhuth 10 had the lowest productivity (3.71 tons ha-1). Additionally, cultivars with rapid growth and high density exhibited greater competitiveness against weeds, minimizing their negative impact on growth and productivity. The removal of either narrow- or broad-leaved weeds had a similar effect in reducing competition and enhancing growth, though the completely weed-free treatment achieved the best results. The study recommends adopting highly competitive cultivars such as Buhuth 22 and enhancing weed control through dense planting and integrated management practices. This combined strategy promotes sustainable wheat productivity, minimizes herbicide dependence and ensures efficient resource utilization for achieving high yields under weed-infested conditions.

References

  1. 1. Ministry of Agriculture, Central Statistical Organization. Wheat and barley production report for 2023. Iraq; 2023. p. 12.
  2. 2. Gawad TA, Jbara OK. Economic effects of intensifying the use of agricultural inputs and modern technologies on the wheat productivity in Iraq. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2023;54(5):1445-56. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i5.1844
  3. 3. Jadoua KhA. Wheat facts and guidelines. Baghdad (Iraq): Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture, General Authority for Agricultural Extension and Training; 1995. p. 25.
  4. 4. Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Cousens RD, Coombes NE. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res. 1996;36(6):505-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1996.tb01679.x
  5. 5. Chalabi FT, Al-Akidi HSM. The competition of the weeds and its effect on the growth characteristics of some varieties of wheat. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2010;2:53-67.
  6. 6. Al-Khaz’Ali AJ, Mutlag NA, Kadum MN, Salman KA. Assessment of the efficacy and impact of certain herbicides in the control of bread wheat narrow leaf weeds (Triticum aestivum L.) on yield components. Int J Agric Stat Sci. 2021;17:1765-70.
  7. 7. Al-Ziady SHA, Hassan DS, Al-Mashhadani ASA. Interaction of foliar nutrients and herbicides into production. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2021;52(5):1225-37. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v52i5.1460
  8. 8. Said J. Evaluation of Chevalier WG and Atlantis OD herbicides to control weeds in winter wheat fields. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2020;51(Special). https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51iSpecial.886
  9. 9. Georgiev M, Stoyanova A, Kuneva V, Delchev G, Sturzu R, Meluca C, et al. Study on the action of foliar herbicides and herbicide combinations for control of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) weeds. Rom Agric Res. 2020;37:211-9. https://doi.org/10.59665/rar3724
  10. 10. Sahooki M, Waheeb KM. Applications in experimental design and analysis. Baghdad (Iraq): Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, University of Baghdad; 1990. p. 488.
  11. 11. Shati RK, Lami SHK. Effect of seed rates and a mixture of herbicides in some growth characteristics of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Tech J. 2011;24(1):1-9.
  12. 12. Ismail SKh. Response of soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and weed associated with the interaction between seed quantities, herbicides and nitrogen fertilization [PhD Thesis]. Baghdad (Iraq): College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad; 2002. p. 131.
  13. 13. Al-Latif M. Impact of chemical herbicides to bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.). Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2022;53(1):91-8. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i1.1512
  14. 14. Al-Khafaji MJ, Safi SMA, Hammood WF. Effect of herbicides on growth, grain yield and quality of barley. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2023;54(4):1094-100. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i4.1801
  15. 15. Heather EM, Navabi A, Frick BL, O’Donovan JT, Spancer DM. The weed competitive of western spring cultivars grow organic management. Crop Sci. 2007;3:505-8.
  16. 16. Patrick WG, Stahlman PW, Chart L. Dose response of five broad leaf weeds to Salflurencil. Weed Technol. 2009;23(2):313-6. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-085.1
  17. 17. Mutlag NA, Al-Khaz’ali AJ, Salman KA, Mahdi RH, Jaber TN. Evaluation of herbicides Pallas and limitless in controlling the narrow and broad leaf weeds within wheat crop fields and their effect on grain yield and its components. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2023;54(3):860-7. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i3.1769
  18. 18. Mohammed M, et al. Impact of weeds to sunflower under zero tillage and phosphorus fertilization. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2019;50(6). https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50i6.836
  19. 19. Al-Khaz’ali AJK, Mutlag NA, Kadum MN, Madhi HM, Salman KA. Evaluation of the efficiency of some herbicides in the control of broad leaves accompanying bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and its effect on yield and yield components. Plant Arch. 2020;20(1):1793-8.
  20. 20. Al-Khaz’ali AJ, Shati RK. Effect of some new herbicides on the competition ability of seven maize cultivars (Zea mays L.) on the accompanying weeds. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2016;47(1):425-37. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v47i2.585
  21. 21. Safi SMA. Control of wheat weeds using herbicides and reflection on yield. Euphrates J Agric Sci. 2016;8(1):134-41.
  22. 22. Mutlag NA, Kadum MN. Effect of planting dates on the yield of three cultivars of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(3). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3547
  23. 23. Mohammed SJ, Ali HA, Khadhum AA, Saleh JM. The effect of temperature and bacteria (Pseudomonas) and Trichoderma in the physical degradation of glyphosate on potato growth. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1262(8):082021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1262/8/082021
  24. 24. Faiath SE, Ibrahim AM, Aljanabi AR, Aldabbagh EJ. Effect of activation of cucumber seeds with different concentrations of zinc under different soaking periods on growth and yield characteristics (Cucumis sativus L.). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1214(1):012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1214/1/012048
  25. 25. Ibrahim AM, Aldabbagh EJ, Abbas AR, Kayat F. Establishment of efficient micropropagation protocols for three kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) cultivars. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2024;55(3):1064-74. https://doi.org/10.36103/dhxnja59
  26. 26. Ibrahim AM, Kayat FB, Susanto D, Ariffullah M, Kashiani P. Callus induction from ovules of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Biotechnology. 2015;14:72-8. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2015.72.78
  27. 27. Al-Khafajy MJ, Majeed HA, Mutlag NA, Cheyed SH. Wheat seed deterioration stimulated by plant extracts. J Agric Sci. 2025;10(2):150-7.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.