Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Influence of nitrogen at different soil depths on crop health indices and yield of rice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9163
Submitted
28 April 2025
Published
05-03-2026

Abstract

Nitrogen plays the most crucial role in the health status and yield of rice. Magnitudes of two crop health indicators, i.e., normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and soil plant analysis development (SPAD) values, depend on the availability of nitrogen in the soil. In coarse-textured soils, where the leaching loss of nitrogen is a major concern, the availability of nitrogen in various depths plays a prominent role in crop health indicators as well as grain yield. Rainfall amounting to 398.8 and 189.3 mm, respectively, during 0–30 and 31–50 days after transplanting (DAT) caused the presence of a notable amount of nitrogen at 40 cm depth. The influence of nitrogen levels on both NDVI and SPAD values was assessed in all observation dates (30, 50, 70 and 90 DAT) through regression analysis. The best possible relationship in terms of the coefficient of determination (R2) value was recorded on 30 DAT. Interestingly, on that day, nitrogen at 40 cm depth showed a higher R2 value (0.81) in relation to NDVI over the nitrogen at 15 cm depth (R2 = 0.78). The relationship between soil nitrogen and SPAD was also strongest on 30 DAT and the R2 values were 0.78 and 0.77 against nitrogen availability, respectively, at 15 and 40 cm depths. Grain yield increased continuously with an increase in nitrogen level till the N200 treatment. After attaining the plateau (5.27 Mg ha-1) at N200, the same decreased marginally at N240. Available nitrogen at both depths strongly influenced the grain yield, with R2 values of 0.88 and 0.86 for nitrogen availability at 15 and 40 cm depths, respectively.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT statistical database. Rome: FAO; 2025.
  2. 2. Fukagawa NK, Ziska LH. Rice: importance for global nutrition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019;65(Suppl):S2. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S2
  3. 3. Mohidem NA, Hashim N, Shamsudin R, Che Man H. Rice for food security: revisiting its production, diversity, rice milling process and nutrient content. Agriculture. 2022;12(6):741. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12060741
  4. 4. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT statistical database. Rome: FAO; 2022.
  5. 5. Shahbandeh M. World rice acreage from 2010 to 2020. 2022.
  6. 6. Government of India. Agricultural statistics at a glance. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Economics and Statistics Division; 2023. p. 272.
  7. 7. ICAR-National Rice Research Institute. Annual report 2023. Cuttack: ICAR-NRRI; 2023. p. 100.
  8. 8. Makino A. Photosynthesis improvement for enhancing productivity in rice. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;67(5):513-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2021.1966290
  9. 9. Makino A, Suzuki Y, Ishiyama K. Enhancing photosynthesis and yield in rice with improved N use efficiency. Plant Sci. 2022;325:111475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111475
  10. 10. Qi Z, Ling F, Jia D, Cui J, Zhang Z, Xu C, et al. Effects of low nitrogen on seedling growth, photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant system of rice varieties with different nitrogen efficiencies. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47260-z
  11. 11. Karim STA, Liu X, Lu Z, Yuan Z, Zhu Y, Cao W. In-season estimation of rice grain yield using critical nitrogen dilution curve. Field Crops Res. 2016;195:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.027
  12. 12. Duque AF, Patino D, Colorado JD, Petro E, Rebolledo MC, Mondragon IF, et al. Characterization of rice yield based on biomass and SPAD-based leaf nitrogen for large genotype plots. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23:5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135917
  13. 13. Zhang Y, Liang K, Zhu F, Zhong X, Lu Z, Chen Y, et al. Differential study on estimation models for indica rice leaf SPAD value and nitrogen concentration based on hyperspectral monitoring. Remote Sens. 2024;16:4604. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234604
  14. 14. Wang H, Zhu Y, Li W, Cao W, Tian Y. Integrating remotely sensed leaf area index and leaf nitrogen accumulation with rice grow model based on particle swarm optimization algorithm for rice grain yield assessment. J Appl Remote Sens. 2014;8(1):083674. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.8.083674
  15. 15. Gitelson AA, Gritz Y, Merzlyak MN. Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. J Plant Physiol. 2003;160(3):271-82. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00887
  16. 16. Fox RH, Walthall CL. Crop monitoring technologies to assess nitrogen status. In: Schepers JS, Raun WR, editors. Nitrogen in agricultural systems. Agron Monogr 49. Madison: ASA; 2008. p. 647-74.
  17. 17. Padilla FM, Peña-Fleitas MT, Gallardo M, Giménez C, Thompson RB. Derivation of sufficiency values of a chlorophyll meter to estimate cucumber nitrogen status and yield. Comput Electron Agric. 2017;141:54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.07.005
  18. 18. Samborski SM, Gozdowski D, Stępień M, Walsh OS, Leszczyńska E. On-farm evaluation of an active optical sensor performance for variable nitrogen application in winter wheat. Eur J Agron. 2016;74:56-67.
  19. 19. Das S, Mohapatra A, Sahu K, Panday D, Ghimire D, Maharjan B. Nitrogen dynamics as a function of soil types, compaction and moisture. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0301296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301296
  20. 20. Toscano P, Castrignanò A, Di Gennaro SF, Vonella AV, Ventrella D, Matese A. Precision agriculture approach for durum wheat yield assessment using remote sensing data and yield mapping. Agronomy. 2019;9:437. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080437
  21. 21. Hnizil O, Baidani A, Khilia I, Nsarellah N, Laamari A, Amamou A. Integrating NDVI, SPAD and canopy temperature for strategic nitrogen and seeding rate management to enhance yield, quality and sustainability in wheat cultivation. Plants. 2024;13:1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111574
  22. 22. Jinwen L, Jingping F, Pinpin F, Junlan S, Dongsheng L, Changshui G, et al. Responses of rice leaf thickness, SPAD readings and chlorophyll a/b ratios to different nitrogen supply rates in paddy field. Field Crops Res. 2009;114:424-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.009
  23. 23. Zhang L, Zhang F, Zhang K, Wang Y, Agathokleous E, Fang C, et al. Nitrogen and organic matter managements improve rice yield and affect greenhouse gas emissions in China’s rice-wheat system. Field Crops Res. 2025;326:109838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109838

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.