Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Farmers' intention to adopt drone technology: A structural equation modelling approach

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9539
Submitted
11 June 2025
Published
01-12-2025

Abstract

Drones have recently become a part of the precision agriculture (PA) technology toolkit. Drones are transforming agricultural methods by improving crop management's accuracy and efficiency. However, despite their potential benefits, adoption rates remain low, and research on drone adoption in agriculture is limited. Thus, this paper aims to assess factors influencing farmers' perceptions of adopting drone technology in agriculture and identify the challenges farmers face when incorporating drone technology into farming practices in the Western Zone of Tamil Nadu. A total of 228 farmers were personally interviewed in 2024 as part of the survey. The Structural Equation Modelling indicated that perceived importance of drones (β = 0.908, p < 0.01), job relevance (β = 0.603, p < 0.01), and farmers' attitude (β = 0.187, p < 0.01) were significant predictors of adoption intention. The model showed strong internal consistency and validity, with Cronbach's Alpha (CA) values between 0.79 and 0.92 and AVE values above 0.70. The findings suggest that increasing farmers' awareness of drone applications specific to their farms and boosting their confidence in using drones can enhance adoption rates. High cost, poor connectivity, limited awareness about the benefits, lack of timely availability of drones during peak seasons, fear of unemployment, and limited availability of training programs emerged as key barriers to drone adoption among farmers. Addressing these challenges is crucial for promoting effective and widespread use of drone technology in agriculture. These insights are valuable for agribusinesses involved in drone development, sales, and services and for research on PA technologies.

References

  1. 1. EU SCAR. Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition – A reflection paper. Brussels, Belgium; 2012. https://doi.org/10.2777/34991
  2. 2. Valin H, Sands RD, Van der Mensbrugghe D, Nelson GC, Ahammad H, Blanc E, et al. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics. 2014;45(1):51–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12089
  3. 3. Gebbers R, Adamchuk VI. Precision agriculture and food security. Science. 2010;327(5967):828–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183899
  4. 4. International Society of Precision Agriculture. The International Society of Precision Agriculture (ISPA). 2020. https://www.ispag.org/
  5. 5. Prabowo GS, Adi AP, Budiyanta AS, Wirawan A, Aziz A, Pranoto FS, et al. Drone-assisted climate-smart agriculture (DACSA): A spatially based outcome prediction model as an initial approach to track yield changes in shallot planting areas. Kuwait Journal of Science. 2025;100388.
  6. 6. Candiago S, Remondino F, De Giglio M, Dubbini M, Gattelli M. Evaluating multispectral images and vegetation indices for precision farming applications from UAV images. Remote Sensing. 2015;7(4):4026–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70404026
  7. 7. European Commission. Drones in agriculture. Brussels, Belgium; 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/toolsdatabases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/Drones_vf.pdf
  8. 8. Moskvitch K. Take off: are drones the future of farming? Engineering & Technology. 2015;10(7–8):62–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2015.0721
  9. 9. Bramley RG, Ouzman J. Farmer attitudes to the use of sensors and automation in fertilizer decision-making: Nitrogen fertilization in the Australian grains sector. Precision Agriculture. 2019;20(1):157–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-9589-y
  10. 10. Zalavadiya UB, Vasoya RN. Significance of drones in precision agriculture. Agric Environ E-Newsletter. 2020;1(2):36–40.
  11. 11. Parameswari P, Walia S. Precision farming: The future of Indian agriculture. In: Conference Proceedings of National Symposium on IFS for 3Es; 2019.
  12. 12. Singh R, Singh S. A review of Indian-based drones in the agriculture sector: Issues, challenges, and solutions. Sensors. 2025;25(15):4876.
  13. 13. Datta S, Rathod MK, Mendhe HS, Pimpale AR, Ambarkar DN, Mante GS, et al. Drone technology in agriculture: A study on economic motivation of farmers. Int J Agric Food Sci. 2025;7(7):330–2.
  14. 14. Rathinavel S, Kavitha R, Surendrakumar A, Mohankumar AP, Suthakar B. Drones for horticulture.
  15. 15. Huang H, Deng J, Lan Y, Yang A, Deng X, Zhang L. A fully convolutional network for weed mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0196302.
  16. 16. Yao W, Wang X, Lan Y, Jin J. Effect of UAV prewetting application during the flowering period of cotton on pesticide droplet deposition. Front Agric Sci Eng. 2018;5(4):455–61.
  17. 17. Xiongkui H, Bonds J, Herbst A, Langenakens J. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicles for plant protection in East Asia. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2017;10(3):18–30.
  18. 18. Panotra N, Kadam DM, Raj A, GD DK, Mohanty LK, Wani R, et al. Optimizing crop monitoring efficiency and precision with drone technology. Arch Curr Res Int. 2025;25(7):1–7.
  19. 19. Rathinavel S, Kavitha R, Gitanjali J, Saiprasanth R. Role of 5G technology in enhancing agricultural mechanization. In: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1258(1):012010. (Repetitive author: Rathinavel S, Kavitha R)
  20. 20. Otani T, Itoh A, Mizukami H, Murakami M, Yoshida S, Terae K, et al. Agricultural robot under solar panels for sowing, pruning, and harvesting in a synecoculture environment. Agriculture. 2022;13(1):18.
  21. 21. Pradhan SK, Nayek D, Muduli S, Patel MA, Padhy C, Mandal A. Revolutionizing Indian agriculture with drones: A comprehensive review of applications, challenges and future prospects. J Geogr Environ Earth Sci Int. 2025;29(3):74–81.
  22. 22. Pingali P. Agricultural mechanization: adoption patterns and economic impact. In: Handbook of Agricultural Economics. 2007;3:2779–805.
  23. 23. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 2000;46(2):186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  24. 24. Ahirwar S, Swarnkar R, Bhukya S, Namwade G. Application of drone in agriculture. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(1):2500–5.
  25. 25. Haenlein M, Kaplan M. A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics. 2004;3(4):283–97.
  26. 26. Anonymous. Budget at a glance 2022–23. India Budget; 2023. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget202223/doc/Budget_at_Glance/bag1.pdf
  27. 27. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  28. 28. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Smith D, Reams R, Hair Jr JF. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. J Fam Bus Strategy. 2014;5(1):105–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
  29. 29. Sarstedt M, Ringle M, Hair J. Partial least squares structural equation modelling. In: Handbook of Market Research. Springer; 2017;13:1–40. (Repetitive author group)
  30. 30. Hair J, Hult T, Ringle M, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications; 2017.
  31. 31. Doss CR. Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: Lessons from 25 years of experience. World Dev. 2001;29(12):2075–92.
  32. 32. Dawodu DA. Drone technology in precision agriculture: Are there no environmental concerns? J Environ Earth Sci. 2020;2224–3216.
  33. 33. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43(1):115–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  34. 34. Balafoutis AT, Beck B, Fountas S, Tsiropoulos Z, Vangeyte J, van der Wal T, et al. Smart farming technologies: Description, taxonomy and economic impact. In: Precision Agriculture: Technology and Economic Perspectives. Springer; 2017. p. 21–77.
  35. 35. Zhang W, Li H, Xia Z, Hu J, Xin M. Grain farmers' technology acceptance behaviour of plant protection UAVs. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2025;9:1583949.
  36. 36. Singh P, Singh P. Drones in Indian agriculture: Trends, challenges and policy implications. New Delhi: Indian Chamber of Food and Agriculture; 2023:1–28. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29651.35366/2
  37. 37. Pathak H, Kumar G, Mohapatra S, Gaikwad B, Rane J. Use of drones in agriculture: Potentials, problems and policy needs. ICAR-Natl Inst Abio Stress Manage. 2020;300:4–15.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.