Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Geographical Information System based spatial fertilizer recommendation mapping using soil test crop response equations and validation in paddy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9583
Submitted
23 May 2025
Published
22-12-2025

Abstract

The main barrier to greater crop output is unpredictability of soil nutrients. It’s necessary to produce location-specific information on status of soil nutrients. This study aimed to develop and validate Geographical Information System (GIS)-based spatial fertilizer recommendation maps using Soil Test Crop Response (STCR) equations for improving rice yield and nutrient management in the command area. The nutrients used to achieve the intended yield are significantly reduced by STCR equation integrated with fertiliser recommendation maps. Gathered 59 composite soil samples in the Hosahalli village tank command area of Hassan district, Karnataka (India) and plotted the nutrient recommendations for desired yields in GIS platform. The interpolation technique was used to create the ready reckoner nutrient tables and nutrient recommendation maps for rice production. Executed a field experiment in farmer's fields of command area in kharif 2021 based on the recommended maps to achieve the targeted yields of 40, 50 and 60 q ha-1 compared with farmer's practice at different organic carbon levels. The study area was acidic, normal EC, low in OC and available P, moderate in available N and K. STCR fertilizer recommendation for 60 q ha-1 targeted yield has recorded higher grain and straw yields. The STCR fertilizer recommendation for 60 q ha-1 target yield increased grain yield by 68 % (53.59 q ha-1 compared to 31.89 q ha-1) and straw yield by 48 % (80.36 q ha-1 compared to 54.12 q ha-1) over farmer practice while reducing fertilizer usage. The rice growth, yield and nutrient uptake were significantly impacted by the fertiliser recommendations for targeted yields. The farmer's precise target yield was achieved with far less fertiliser owing to the thematic nutrient recommendation maps.   

References

  1. 1. Pathak H, Mishra JP, Mohapatra T. Indian agriculture after independence. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi; 2022.
  2. 2. Sharma PK. Emerging technologies of remote sensing and GIS for the development of spatial data structure. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2004;52:384–406.
  3. 3. Mandal AK, Sharma RC. Computerized database of salt-affected soils in peninsular India using geographic information system. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2010;58(1):105–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106040801966829
  4. 4. FAO. The digitized soils map of the world including derived soil properties. FAO, Rome; 1996.
  5. 5. Johnston AM, Khurana HS, Majumdar K, Satyanarayana T. Site specific nutrient management-concept, current research and future challenges in Indian agriculture. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2009;57(1):1–10.
  6. 6. Itichaa B, Takeleb C. Digital soil mapping for site-specific management of soils. Geoderma. 2019;351:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.026
  7. 7. Rawal N, Acharya K, Bam CR, Acharya K. Soil fertility mapping of different VDCs of Sunsari District, Nepal using GIS. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol. 2018;6(2):142–51. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v6i2.20424
  8. 8. Getahun D, Feyisa A, Dejene L, Girma D. Soil test-based crop response phosphorus calibration study on bread wheat in Degem District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia. Int J Econ Energy Environ. 2020;5(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20200501.11
  9. 9. Walkley AJ, Black CA. An examination of the method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38.
  10. 10. Black CA. Soil plant relationship. 2nd ed. New York Pub.; 1965. p. 515–16.
  11. 11. Basavaraja PK, Prakash SS, MohamedSaqeebulla H, Dey P, Nethradhanirai CR, Veerabhadraiah AM, et al. STCR targeted approach of fertilizer recommendation for different crops and soils of Karnataka. AICRP on STCR, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru; 2017.
  12. 12. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; 1973. p. 498.
  13. 13. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. IRRI, Wiley-Inter Sci. Pub., New York; 1984. p. 680.
  14. 14. Behera SK, Shukla AK. Spatial distribution of surface acidity, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon content and exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium in some cropped acid soils of India. Land Degrad Dev. 2015;26:71–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2306
  15. 15. Amare T, Terefe AG, Selassie Y, Yitaferu B, Wolfgramm B, Hurni H. Soil properties and crop yields along the terraces and toposequence of Anjeni Watershed, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. J Agril Sci. 2013;5(2):134–44. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n2p134
  16. 16. Osman KT. Soils: principles, properties and management. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5663-2
  17. 17. Brevik EC, Fenton TE, Lazari A. Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping. Precis Agric. 2016;7:393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9021-x
  18. 18. Mengistu D, Bewket W, Lal R. Conservation effects on soil quality and climate change. Land Degrad Dev. 2016;27:1603–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2376
  19. 19. Sharma KR, Jassal HS, Sondhi A. Soil site characteristics and productivity assessment of Nara-Dada-Manjhi watershed in semi-arid hilly tract of Punjab. Ann Arid Zone. 2002;41(2):119–26.
  20. 20. Bereket A, Tadesse A, Kibert K, Melese A. Phosphorus status and adsorption characteristics of acid soils from Cheha and Dinsho districts, southern highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 2018;7:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-018-0121-1
  21. 21. Birhanu I, Muktar M, Kibebew K. Impact of deforestation and subsequent cultivation on soil fertility in Komto, Western Ethiopia. J Soil Sci Environ Manag. 2016;7(12):212–21. https://doi.org/10.5897/JSSEM2016.0578
  22. 22. Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Crop Sci. 2010;327:1008–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182570
  23. 23. Ghiri MN, Abtahi A. Factors affecting potassium fixation in calcareous soils of southern Iran. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2012;58:335–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2010.507194
  24. 24. Blanchet G, Libohova Z, Joost S, Rossier N, Schneider A, Jeangros B, et al. Spatial variability of potassium in agricultural soils of the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland. Geoderma. 2017;290:107–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.12.002
  25. 25. Mandal L, Maiti D, Bondyopordhyay P. Response of zinc in transplanted rice under integrated nutrient management in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Oryza. 2009;46(2):113–15.
  26. 26. Biradar DP, Aladakatti YR, Basavanneppa MA. Enhancing the productivity and economic returns of field crops with balanced nutrient application through site-specific nutrient management approach. Agro-Info Precision Agric. 2012;146–51.
  27. 27. Singh VK, Majumdar K, Singh MP, Rajkumar, Gangawar B. Maximizing productivity and profits through site specific nutrient management in rice-based cropping systems. Better Crops. 2011;95(2):28–30.
  28. 28. Belete F, Dechassa N, Molla A, Tana T. Effect of split application of different N rates on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agric Food Secur. 2018;7(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0242-9
  29. 29. Sandhu SS, Mahal SS. Performance of rice (Oryza sativa) under different planting methods, nitrogen levels and irrigation schedules. Indian J Agron. 2014;59(3):392–7.
  30. 30. Pradeep G, Channanaik D, Rajanna GA, Sannathimmappa HG, Ramesha YM, Veeresha. Economics and nutrient uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced by various levels of FYM and cattle urine application in Bhadra command area of Karnataka. Crop Res. 2012;43(1/3):10–14.
  31. 31. Ibajanai K. Long term effect of prescription-based fertilizer application on soil carbon and potassium dynamics under maize–wheat cropping system in an acid Alfisol. Indian J Agron. 2017;62(3):187–92. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/276874

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.