Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Application of nanoscience and technology for increasing the shelf life of seeds and fruits of horticulture crops

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9772
Submitted
2 June 2025
Published
26-02-2026

Abstract

The use of nanoscience and technology in horticulture has attracted significant attention due to its potential to enhance the shelf life of seeds and fruits. Nanotechnology-based methods, such as nanocoatings, nanoencapsulation, nanoemulsions and nano-packaging, have shown promising results in preserving the freshness of fruits and seeds by minimizing microbial contamination, reducing post-harvest losses and improving seed viability. Nanomaterials such as silver nanoparticles, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, chitosan and carbon-based nanostructures exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant and controlled-release properties, which contribute to extending the storage periods. This review examines the recent advancements in nanotechnology for post-harvest preservation, emphasizing the mechanisms, benefits and challenges associated with these innovative techniques. Biodegradable nanoparticles are emerging as environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical preservatives in food preservation. Additionally, advanced nano biosensors are being developed to measure freshness in real time and detect spoilage at an early stage. Research and policy development are necessary to address issues including cost-effectiveness, regulatory concerns and environmental impacts, despite these encouraging benefits. Furthermore, the environmental and safety concerns related to nanomaterial applications in horticultural products are discussed. Integrating nanotechnology in horticulture presents a sustainable and efficient solution to meet global food security demands by minimizing post-harvest losses and improving crop productivity and food security, making it a crucial area for future innovation and investment.

References

  1. 1. Muchhadiya RM, Langoo EB, Kumar A, Jena L, Pathakakula S. Nanotechnology in enhancing shelf-life of horticultural produce. In: Frontiers in Horticulture Sustainability. 2024 May. p. 125. ISBN: 978-81-972354-3-6.
  2. 2. Dubey PK, Shukla RN, Srivastava G, Mishra AA, Pandey A. Study on quality parameters and storage stability of mango coated with developed nanocomposite edible film. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(4):2899–935. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.339
  3. 3. Riseh RS, Vatankhah M, Hassanisaadi M, Shafiei-Hematabad Z, Kennedy JF. Advancements in coating technologies: unveiling the potential of chitosan for the preservation of fruits and vegetables. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;254:127677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127677
  4. 4. Brady CJ. Fruit ripening. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1987;38(1):155–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.001103
  5. 5. Rhim JW, Wang LF, Hong SI. Preparation and characterization of agar/chitosan blend films: Part 8. Antimicrobial activity, gas barrier properties, and biodegradability. Food Chem. 2016;196:1275–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.052
  6. 6. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A, Kaus NHM, Ann LC, Bakhori SKM, et al. Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015;7(3):219–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x
  7. 7. Zhai X, et al. Effect of chitosan-based edible coating containing nanoparticles on the postharvest quality of strawberry. J Food Sci. 2015;80(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14803
  8. 8. Ibrahim HMM, Ali MA, Abd Allatif AM. Alginate-based zinc oxide nanoparticles coating extends storage life and maintains quality parameters of mango fruits cv. Keitt. Coatings. 2023;13(2):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020362
  9. 9. Aghamolaei R, Ghaani MR, Tahsildoost M, Zandi M. A comprehensive energy-oriented approach for optimization of solar potential in urban contexts. Adv Build Energy Res. 2019;13(2):205–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2018.1488613
  10. 10. Gudadhe JA, Rai M, Yadav A, Durán N, Marcato PD, Gade A. Preparation of an agar-silver nanoparticles film for increasing the shelf-life of fruits. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014;8(4):190–5. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2013.0010
  11. 11. Shivakumar G, SC C, SM S. Antifungal activity of chitosan-silver nanoparticle composite against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides associated with mango anthracnose. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8(17):1803–12. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2013.6584
  12. 12. Kumar S, Shukla A, Baul PP, Mitra A, Halder D. Biodegradable hybrid nanocomposites of chitosan/gelatin and silver nanoparticles for active food packaging applications. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2018;16:178–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.03.008
  13. 13. Sidorowicz A, Szymański T, Rybka JD. Photodegradation of brilliant blue R using organometallic silver nanoparticles synthesized through a green chemistry method. Biology. 2021;10(8):784. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10080784
  14. 14. Bhople S, Gaikwad S, Deshmukh S, Bonde S, Gade A, Sen S, et al. Myxobacteria-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their impregnation in wrapping paper used for enhancing shelf life of apples. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2016;10(6):389–94. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0111
  15. 15. Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A, González-Martínez C. Quality of cold-stored strawberries as affected by chitosan–oleic acid edible coatings. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2006;41(2):164–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.03.016
  16. 16. Dhital R, Mora NB, Watson DG, Kohli P, Choudhary R. Efficacy of limonene nano-coatings on postharvest shelf life of strawberries. LWT. 2018;97:124–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.038
  17. 17. Ali A, Muhammad MTM, Sijam K, Siddiqui Y. Effect of chitosan coatings on physicochemical characteristics of Eksotika II papaya (Carica papaya L.) during cold storage. Food Chem. 2011;124(2):620–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.085
  18. 18. Maftoonazad N, Ramaswamy HS, Marcotte M. Shelf-life extension of peaches through sodium alginate and methyl cellulose edible coatings. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2008;43(6):951–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01444.x
  19. 19. Kharchoufi S, Parafati L, Licciardello F, Muratore G, Hamdi M, Cirvilleri G, Restuccia C. Edible coatings incorporating pomegranate peel extract and biocontrol yeast to reduce Penicillium digitatum postharvest decay of oranges. Food Microbiol. 2018;74:107–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.03.011
  20. 20. Chien PJ, Sheu F, Yang FH. Effects of edible chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of sliced mango fruit. J Food Eng. 2007;78(1):225–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.022
  21. 21. de Aquino AB, Blank AF, de Aquino Santana LC. Impact of edible chitosan–cassava starch coatings enriched with Lippia gracilis Schauer genotype mixtures on the shelf life of guavas (Psidium guajava L.). Food Chem. 2015;171:108–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.077
  22. 22. Petretto GL, Fancello F, Bakhy K, Faiz CA, Sibawayh Z, Chessa M, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Cuminum cyminum L. collected in different areas of Morocco. Food Biosci. 2018;22:50–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2018.01.004
  23. 23. Li J, Sun Q, Sun Y, Chen B, Wu X, Le T. Improvement of banana postharvest quality using a novel soybean protein isolate/cinnamaldehyde/zinc oxide bionanocomposite coating strategy. Sci Hortic. 2019;258:108786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108786
  24. 24. Lustriane C, Dwivany FM, Suendo V, Reza M. Effect of chitosan and chitosan-nanoparticles on postharvest quality of banana fruits. J Plant Biotechnol. 2018;45(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2018.45.1.036
  25. 25. Esyanti RR, Zaskia H, Amalia A, Nugrahapraja DH. Chitosan nanoparticle-based coating as post-harvest technology in banana. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1204:012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012109
  26. 26. La DD, Nguyen-Tri P, Le KH, Nguyen PT, Nguyen MD, Vo AT, et al. Effects of antibacterial ZnO nanoparticles on the performance of a chitosan/gum arabic edible coating for post-harvest banana preservation. Prog Org Coat. 2021;151:106057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106057Iuliani S, Wardana AA, Meindrawan B, Edhi N, Muchtadi TR. Nanocomposite edible coating from cassava starch, stearic acid and ZnO nanoparticles to maintain quality of fresh-cut mango cv. Arumanis. The Annals of the University Dunarea De Jos of Galati. Fascicle VI-Food Technology. 2018 Nov 20;42(2):49-58.
  27. 27. Iuliani S, Wardana AA, Meindrawan B, Edhi N, Muchtadi TR. Nanocomposite edible coating from cassava starch, stearic acid and ZnO nanoparticles to maintain quality of fresh-cut mango cv. Arumanis. Ann Univ Dunarea de Jos Galati Food Technol. 2018;42(2):49–58.
  28. 28. Lakshmi SJ, Roopa Bai RS, Sharanagouda H, Ramachandra CT, Nadagouda S, Nidoni U. Effect of biosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles coating on quality parameters of fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(3):10–4.
  29. 29. Gad MM, Zagzog OA. Mixing xanthan gum and chitosan nanoparticles to form new coating for maintaining storage life and quality of Elmamoura guava fruits. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(11):1582–93. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.190
  30. 30. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(1):105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
  31. 31. Shah S, Hashmi MS. Chitosan–aloe vera gel coating delays postharvest decay of mango fruit. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2020;61(2):279–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00224-7
  32. 32. Nemati SH, Esfandiyari B, Tehranifar A, Rezaei A, Ashrafi SJ. Effect of nano-silver particles on postharvest life of Lilium orientalis cv. Shocking. Int J Postharvest Technol Innov. 2014;4(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPTI.2014.064143
  33. 33. Song H, Yuan W, Jin P, Wang W, Wang X, Yang L, Zhang Y. Effects of chitosan/nano-silica on postharvest quality and antioxidant capacity of loquat fruit during cold storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016;119:41–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.015
  34. 34. Li D, Ye Q, Jiang L, Luo Z. Effects of nano-TiO₂–LDPE packaging on postharvest quality and antioxidant capacity of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) stored at refrigeration temperature. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97:1116–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8040
  35. 35. Wang K, Jin P, Shang H, Li H, Xu F, Hu Q, et al. A combination of hot air treatment and nano-packing reduces fruit decay and maintains quality in postharvest Chinese bayberries. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;90(14):2427–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4102
  36. 36. Nasrollahzadeh M, Issaabadi Z, Sajjadi M, Sajadi SM, Atarod M. Types of nanostructures. In: Interface Science and Technology. Vol 28. Elsevier; 2019. p. 29–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813586-0.00002-X
  37. 37. Seethapathy P, Gurudevan T, Subramanian KS, Kuppusamy P. Bacterial antagonists and hexanal-induced systemic resistance of mango fruits against Lasiodiplodia theobromae causing stem-end rot. J Plant Interact. 2016;11(1):158–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1252068
  38. 38. Jincy M, Djanaguiraman M, Jeyakumar P, Subramanian KS, Jayasankar S, Paliyath G. Inhibition of phospholipase D enzyme activity through hexanal leads to delayed mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit ripening. Sci Hortic. 2017;218:316–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.026
  39. 39. Ratnayake UN. Nanomaterials add value to rubber industry. Rubber Asia. 2015;1–5.
  40. 40. Neethirajan S, Jayas DS. Nanotechnology for the food and bioprocessing industries. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011;4(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0328-2
  41. 41. Greiner R, Oehlke K, Yada R. Current and projected application of nanomaterials in the food sector. 2014.
  42. 42. Kalach A. Multisensor systems application for CO₂-extraction of spices identification. Sens Transducers Mag. 2004;42(4):201–7.
  43. 43. Sujithra S, Manikkandan TR. Application of nanotechnology in packaging of foods: a review. Int J ChemTech Res. 2019;12(4):7–14. https://doi.org/10.20902/IJCTR.2019.120402
  44. 44. Yang FM, Li HM, Li F, Xin ZH, Zhao LY, Zheng YH, et al. Effect of nano-packing on preservation quality of fresh strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch. cv. Fengxiang) during storage at 4 °C. J Food Sci. 2010;75(3):C236–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01520.x
  45. 45. Bodbodak S, Rafiee Z. Recent trends in active packaging in fruits and vegetables. In: Eco-friendly Technology for Postharvest Produce Quality. Academic Press; 2016. p. 77–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804313-4.00003-7
  46. 46. Li H, Li F, Wang L, Sheng J, Xin Z, Zhao L, et al. Effect of nano-packing on preservation quality of Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill. var. inermis (Bunge) Rehd.). Food Chem. 2009;114(2):547–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.085
  47. 47. Hu AW, Fu ZH. Nanotechnology and its application in packaging and packaging machinery. Packaging Engineering. 2003;24:22–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39303-2_6
  48. 48. Zhang X, Xiao G, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Su H, Tan T. Preparation of chitosan–TiO₂ composite film with efficient antimicrobial activities under visible light for food packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;169:101–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.073
  49. 49. Zhu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Shang Y, Zhang X, Wen Y. Preparation of PAN@TiO₂ nanofibers for fruit packaging materials with efficient photocatalytic degradation of ethylene. Materials. 2019;12(6):896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060896
  50. 50. Yadav S, Mehrotra GK, Dutta PK. Chitosan-based ZnO nanoparticles loaded gallic-acid films for active food packaging. Food Chem. 2021;334:127605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127605
  51. 51. Gu R, Yun H, Chen L, Wang Q, Huang X. Regenerated cellulose films with amino-terminated hyperbranched polyamic anchored nanosilver for active food packaging. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(1):602–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00992
  52. 52. Pérez-Moreno A, Fabián FL, Hermes PH, Edgar VN, Ileana VR, Ali A. Nanoscience and nanotechnology regarding food packaging and nanomaterials to extend postharvest and shelf life of foods. In: Food Losses, Sustainable Postharvest and Food Technologies. Academic Press; 2021. p. 313–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821912-6.00001-8
  53. 53. Quintanilla-Carvajal MX, Camacho-Díaz BH, Meraz-Torres LS, Chanona-Pérez JJ, Alamilla-Beltrán L, Jiménez-Aparicio A, Gutiérrez-López GF. Nanoencapsulation: a new trend in food engineering processing. Food Eng Rev. 2010;2:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-009-9012-6
  54. 54. Sinha VK, Vinay A, Bhinge JR. Nanocochleates: a novel drug delivery technology. Pharmainfo.net. 2008;6(5):22–32.
  55. 55. Augustin MA, Sanguansri P. Nanostructured materials in the food industry. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;58:183–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58005-9
  56. 56. Sanguansri P, Augustin MA. Nanoscale materials development: a food industry perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17(10):547–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2006.04.010
  57. 57. Mishra BB, Patel BB, Tiwari S. Colloidal nanocarriers: a review on formulation technology, types and applications toward targeted drug delivery. Nanomedicine. 2010;6(1):9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2009.04.008
  58. 58. Rhim JW. Increase in water vapor barrier property of biopolymer-based edible films and coatings by compositing with lipid materials. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2004;13(4):528–35.
  59. 59. Ravichandran R. Nanotechnology applications in food and food processing: innovative green approaches, opportunities and uncertainties for global market. Int J Green Nanotechnol Phys Chem. 2010;1(2):P72–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19430871003684440
  60. 60. Zambrano-Zaragoza ML, Gutiérrez-Cortez E, Del Real A, González-Reza RM, Galindo-Pérez MJ, Quintanar-Guerrero D. Fresh-cut Red Delicious apples coating using tocopherol/mucilage nanoemulsion: effect on polyphenol oxidase and pectin methylesterase activities. Food Res Int. 2014;62:974–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.011
  61. 61. Gardesh AS, Badii F, Hashemi M, Ardakani AY, Maftoonazad N, Gorji AM. Effect of nanochitosan-based coating on climacteric behavior and postharvest shelf-life extension of apple cv. Golab Kohanz. LWT. 2016;70:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.002
  62. 62. Azeem A, Rizwan M, Ahmad FJ, Iqbal Z, Khar RK, Aqil M, et al. Nanoemulsion components screening and selection: a technical note. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(1):69–76. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-008-9178-x
  63. 63. Zahid N, Ali A, Manickam S, Siddiqui Y, Maqbool M. Potential of chitosan-loaded nanoemulsions to control Colletotrichum spp. and maintain quality of tropical fruits during cold storage. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113(4):925–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05398.x
  64. 64. Ohashi TL, Pilon L, Spricigo PC, Miranda M, Corrêa DS, Ferreira MD. Postharvest quality of ‘Golden’ papayas (Carica papaya L.) coated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions. Rev Iberoam Tecnol Postcosecha. 2015;16(2):199–209.
  65. 65. Charych D, Cheng Q, Reichert A, Kuziemko G, Stroh M, Nagy JO, et al. A “litmus test” for molecular recognition using artificial membranes. Chem Biol. 1996;3(2):113–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(96)90287-2
  66. 66. de Oliveira Filho JG, Miranda M, Ferreira MD, Plotto A. Nanoemulsions as edible coatings: a potential strategy for fresh fruits and vegetables preservation. Foods. 2021;10(10):2438. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102438
  67. 67. Kumar J, Sandaka BP, Kumar D. Biosensors, monitoring of analytes and implications in horticulture. In: Innovative Methods in Horticultural Crop Improvement: Biosensors and Nanosensors. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 3–23.
  68. 68. Manasa G, Bhakta AK, Mekhalif Z, Mascarenhas RJ. Bismuth-nanoparticles decorated multi-wall carbon nanotubes cast-coated on carbon paste electrode for sensitive determination of gallic acid at neutral pH. Mater Sci Energy Technol. 2020;3:174–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.10.001
  69. 69. Gomes DG, Pieretti JC, Rolim WR, Seabra AB, Oliveira HC. Advances in nano-based delivery systems of micronutrients for a greener agriculture. In: Advances in Nano-fertilizers and Nano-pesticides in Agriculture. Woodhead Publishing; 2021. p. 111–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820092-6.00005-7
  70. 70. Chaupoo AS, Dhakad A, Beese S, Kumar A, Kumar P, Pandey SK, et al. Transforming horticulture: the influence of nanotechnology on crop enhancement. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(11):3381–400. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113512
  71. 71. Blois L, Lay-Ekuakille A. Reliability and metrology features for manufacturing process of nanoelements for geo-environmental protection. In: 2018 Nanotechnology for Instrumentation and Measurement (NANOFIM); 2018 Nov 7; Italy. IEEE; 2018. p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/NANOFIM.2018.8688605
  72. 72. Khan MR, Rizvi TF. Application of nanofertilizer and nanopesticides for improvements in crop production and protection. In: Nanoscience and Plant–Soil Systems. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 405–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46835-8_15
  73. 73. Manjunatha SB, Biradar DP, Aladakatti YR. Nanotechnology and its applications in agriculture: a review. J Farm Sci. 2016;29(1):1–3.
  74. 74. Li X, Li W, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Yun J, Tang Y, et al. Effect of nano-ZnO-coated active packaging on quality of fresh-cut ‘Fuji’ apple. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2011;46(9):1947–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02706.x
  75. 75. Mohasedat Z, Dehestani-Ardakani M, Kamali K, Eslami F. The effects of nano-bio fertilizer on vegetative growth and nutrient uptake in seedlings of three apple cultivars. Adv Bioresearch. 2018;9(2):1–6.
  76. 76. Ranjbar S, Ramezanian A, Rahemi M. Nano-calcium and its potential to improve ‘Red Delicious’ apple fruit characteristics. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2020;61:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00168-y
  77. 77. Davarpanah S, Tehranifar A, Davarynejad G, Abadía J, Khorasani R. Effects of foliar applications of zinc and boron nano-fertilizers on pomegranate (Punica granatum cv. Ardestani) fruit yield and quality. Sci Hortic. 2016;210:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.003
  78. 78. Semida WM, Abdelkhalik A, Mohamed GF, Abd El-Mageed TA, Abd El-Mageed SA, Rady MM, et al. Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles promotes drought stress tolerance in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plants. 2021;10(2):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020421
  79. 79. Abdelaziz FH, Akl AM, Mohamed AY, Zakier MA. Response of keitte mango trees to spray boron prepared by nanotechnology technique. NY Sci J. 2019;12:48–55. https://doi.org/10.7537/marsnys120619.06
  80. 80. Al-Jilihawi DA, Merza TK. Effect of soil fertilization and foliar nano-NPK on growth of key lemon (Citrus aurantifolia) rootstock saplings. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):3955–8.
  81. 81. Ajirloo AR, Shaaban M, Motlagh ZR. Effect of K nano-fertilizer and N bio-fertilizer on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Int J Adv Biol Biom Res. 2015;3(1):138–43.
  82. 82. Al-Uthery HW, Al-Shami QM. Impact of fertigation of nano-NPK fertilizers, nutrient use efficiency and distribution in soil of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Arch. 2019;19:1087–96.
  83. 83. Merghany MM, Shahein MM, Sliem MA, Abdelgawad KF, Radwan AF. Effect of nano-fertilizers on cucumber plant growth, fruit yield and its quality. Plant Arch. 2019;19(2):165–72.
  84. 84. Hassani A, Tajali AA, Mazinani SH, Hassani M. Effect of conventional chemical fertilizers and nano-fertilizers of iron, zinc and potassium on quantitative yield of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). 2015;3(4):1078–82.
  85. 85. Fatemi H, Esmaielpour B, Soltani-Toolarood A, Zadeh AN. Effects of silicon nanoparticle nutrition on growth and physiological
  86. characteristics of Coriandrum sativum L. under lead stress. Iran. J. Med. Aromat. Plants Res. 2017;33(5);853-70. https://doi.org/10.22092/
  87. ijmapr.2017.114488.2068
  88. 86. Safaei Z, Azizi M, Davarynejad G, Aroiee H. Effect of foliar application of humic acid and nanofertilizer (Pharmks®) on yield and yield components of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). J Med Plants By-Prod. 2014;3(2):133–40.
  89. 87. Bromand Sivieri M, Heidary M, Gholami A, Ghorbani H. Effects of foliar application of nano iron oxide and biofertilizers on antioxidant enzyme activity and physiological characteristics of root and aerial parts of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Iran J Hortic Sci. 2021;4. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2019.274442.1591
  90. 88. Rezaei-Chiyaneh E, Rahimi S, Rahimi A, Hadi H, Mahdavikia H. Response of seed yield and essential oil of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) to foliar spraying of nano-fertilizers. J Med Plants By-Prod. 2018;7(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.22092/jmpb.2018.116726
  91. 89. Sarhan A, Habib A, Fahmy A, Noor El-Deen T, Selim A. Effect of nano, bio and chemical fertilization and moringa leaf extract on flowering and chemical constituents of gladiolus. Egypt J Chem. 2021;0(0). https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.101614.4727
  92. 90. Erfani Alamdari S, Rezaei MA, Farahvash F, Janlou MM. Effects of nano-potassium and potassium sulfate fertilizers and salicylic acid on morphophysiological traits of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) under drought stress. Int J Mod Agric. 2021;10(1):286–97.
  93. 91. Hamid H, Mahewish, Radi FH, Radhi MN. Response of rosemary plant to nano-NPK fertilizer and biological factors and their effects on active substances. Univ Thi-Qar J Agric Res. 2021;10(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.54174/utjagr.v10i1.115
  94. 92. Sidorowicz A, Maqbool Q, Nazar M. Future of nanofertilizer. In: Nanotechnology for Agriculture: Crop Production and Protection. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 143–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9374-8_8
  95. 93. Ditta A, Arshad M. Applications and perspectives of using nanomaterials for sustainable plant nutrition. Nanotechnol Rev. 2016;5(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2015-0060
  96. 94. Wang P, Lombi E, Zhao FJ, Kopittke PM. Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21(8):699–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.005
  97. 95. Zamri B, Masarudin M. Nanotechnology in agriculture: a review of innovative utilization. Malays NANO Int J. 2023;3:50–64. https://doi.org/10.22452/mnij.vol3no2.4
  98. 96. Narashans AS, Kumar N, Choudhary R, Bajpai VK, Cao H, Shukla S, Pareek S. Prospecting the role of nanotechnology in extending the shelf-life of fresh produce and developing advanced packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2022;34:100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100955

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.