Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Decision support system for climate-resilient runoff estimation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9877
Submitted
6 June 2025
Published
31-12-2025

Abstract

This study addresses the critical need for climate-resilient hydrological tools by developing Decision Support System (DSS). The DSS integrates a modified Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method with high-resolution geospatial datasets, such as Sentinel-2 Land-Use/Land-Cover (LULC), OpenLand soil properties, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM)- Digital Elevation Model (DEM) topography and Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS) precipitation, to simulate historical and near-real-time runoff. Furthermore, it incorporates CMIP6 climate projections to facilitate future runoff estimation. Validated across two contrasting Indian watersheds-the monsoon-driven Salebhata catchment (R² = 0.82) and semi-arid Venkatapur sub-watershed (R² = 0.78). The model performs well at capturing seasonal variability, including monsoon floods, runoff during dry spells, seasonal extremes and variations across different areas. Its user-friendly application enables stakeholders to create real-time, location-specific runoff estimates through polygon-based analysis, which directly facilitates flood forecasting and adaptive water resource management. By incorporating climate projections and high-resolution geospatial analysis, this framework provides a reproducible platform for climate-resilient water resource planning, especially in data-poor regions exposed to hydroclimatic extremes.

References

  1. 1. Mohammad FS, Adamowski J. Interfacing geographic information system, remote sensing and the soil conservation service curve number method to estimate curve number and runoff volume in the Asir region of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 2015;8:11093-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1994-1
  2. 2. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press; 2021. p. 1-2391.
  3. 3. Milly PC, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, et al. Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science. 2008;319(5863):573-4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915
  4. 4. Tessema SM, Lyon SW, Setegn SG. Effects of different retention parameter estimation methods on the prediction of surface runoff using the SCS curve number method. Water Resour Manag. 2014;28:315-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0674-3
  5. 5. Singh PK, Gaur ML, Mishra SK, Rawat SS. An updated hydrological review on recent advancements in soil conservation service curve number technique. J Water Clim Change. 2010;1(2):118-34. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2010.022
  6. 6. Al-Ghobari H, Dewidar A, Alataway A. Estimation of surface water runoff for a semi-arid area using RS and GIS-based SCS-CN method. Water. 2020;12(7):1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071924
  7. 7. Haider S, Masood MU, Rashid M, Alshehri F, Pande CB, Katipoğlu OM, et al. Simulation of the potential impacts of projected climate and land use change on runoff under CMIP6 scenarios. Water. 2023;15(19):3421. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193421
  8. 8. Kumar A, Kanga S, Taloor AK, Singh SK, Đurin B. Surface runoff estimation of Sind river basin using integrated SCS-CN and GIS techniques. HydroResearch. 2021;4:61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2021.08.001
  9. 9. Muneer AS, Sayl KN, Kamel AH. Modeling of runoff in arid regions using remote sensing and geographic information system. Int J Des Nat Ecodyn. 2020;15(5):691-700. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150511
  10. 10. Akbari S, Singh R. Hydrological modelling of catchments using MIKE SHE. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Adv Eng Sci Manag; 2012. p. 335-40.
  11. 11. Nirmala B, Rejani R, Kumar KS, Kumar RS. Estimation of runoff using SCS-CN method and geographic information system under changing climatic scenarios in Halia catchment. Indian J Soil Conserv. 2022;50(2):113-9. https://doi.org/10.59797/ijsc.v50.i2.166
  12. 12. Brown CF, Brumby SP, Guzder-Williams B, Birch T, Hyde SB, Mazzariello J, et al. Dynamic World: near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01307-4
  13. 13. Thrasher B, Wang W, Michaelis A, Melton F, Lee T, Nemani R. NASA Earth exchange global daily downscaled projections (NEX-GDDP-CMIP6). NASA Center Clim Simul; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01393-4
  14. 14. Funk C, Peterson P, Landsfeld M, Pedreros D, Verdin J, Shukla S, et al. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations: a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci Data. 2015;2:150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66
  15. 15. Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, et al. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys. 2007;45(2):RG2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183
  16. 16. Hengl T. Soil texture classes (USDA system) for six soil depths at 250 m. Version v02. Zenodo; 2018.
  17. 17. Hawkins RH, Ward TJ, Woodward DE, Van Mullem JA, editors. Curve number hydrology: state of the practice. Reston: Am Soc Civ Eng; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784410042
  18. 18. Deshmukh DS, Chaube UC, Hailu AE, Gudeta DA, Kassa MT. Estimation and comparison of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoff data and land slope. J Hydrol. 2013;492:89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.001
  19. 19. Pan Z, Yang S, Ren X, Lou H, Zhou B, Wang H, et al. GEE can prominently reduce uncertainties from input data and parameters of the remote sensing-driven distributed hydrological model. Sci Total Environ. 2023;870:161852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161852
  20. 20. Jaiswal RK, Lohani AK, Tiwari HL. A decision support system framework for strategic water resources planning and management under projected climate scenarios for a reservoir complex. J Hydrol. 2021;603:127051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127051
  21. 21. Vivoni ER, Entekhabi D, Bras RL, Ivanov VY. Controls on runoff generation and scale-dependence in a distributed hydrologic model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2007;11(5):1683-701. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1683-2007

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.