Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2021)

Differential expression of selected Arabidopsis resistant genes under abiotic stress conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2021.8.4.1213
Submitted
18 April 2021
Published
21-08-2021 — Updated on 01-10-2021

Abstract

The plant immune system is equipped with several defensive layers to evade pathogen attack. One of the primary defense includes plasma membrane-localized receptors explicitly detect conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Transcriptional reprogramming of resistant genes confers PAMP-triggered immunity. Consequently basal immunity is triggered which is primarily mediated by several intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine rich repeat receptors. Subsequently, nucleotide-binding leucine rich repeat receptors sense pathogens and activate another defense response known as effector triggered immunity. Both the PTI and ETI are mediated by resistant genes. Interestingly, the detailed molecular function of resistant genes is not yet fully revealed. Resistant genes are also well involved in non pathophysiological conditions such as during cold stress, heat stress, duration of exposure of light and drought stress. Here, we have reported that the Arabidopsis resistant genes AT1G17600, AT4G14368, AT4G16860, AT5G40910 and AT5G45050 are temperature regulated. We found that the transcript levels of AT1G58400, AT2G14080, AT2G17055, AT3G51560, AT4G16950, AT5G40910 and AT5G45050 were significantly raised for the plant samples grown under short-day conditions. The transcript levels of AT1G17600, AT1G27180, AT1G33560, AT2G14080, AT3G51560, AT4G16860 and AT4G16950 were upregulated for plants grown under drought stress conditions. In Arabidopsis, the transcriptional reprogramming is modulated by decapping protein factors. There was no significant change in the protein level of DCPs. Our results suggest that under abiotic stress conditions, the resistant genes differentially express independent of the decapping event.

References

  1. Flor HH. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1971;9:275-96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.09.090171.001423
  2. Panigrahi GK, Satapathy KB. Sacrificed surveillance process favours plant defense: a review. Plant Archives. 2020;20(1):2551-59.
  3. Böhm H, Albert I, Fan L, Reinhard A, Nürnberger T. Immune receptor complexes at the plant cell surface. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2014;20:47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.04.007
  4. Macho AP, Zipfel C. Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Mol Cell. 2014;54(2):263-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.028
  5. Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2009;60: 379-406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346
  6. Panigrahi GK, Sahoo A, Satapathy KB. Insights to plant immunity: Defense signaling to epigenetics. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 2021;101568:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2020.101568
  7. Panigrahi GK, Satapathy KB. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae infection orchestrates the fate of the Arabidopsis J domain containing cochaperone and decapping protein factor 5. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 2021;101598:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2020.101598
  8. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286
  9. Cui H, Tsuda K, Parker JE. Effector-triggered immunity: from pathogen perception to robust defense. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2015;66:487-511. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040012
  10. Dodds PN, Rathjen JP. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010;11(8):539-48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2812
  11. Panigrahi GK, Sahoo AS. A review on Natural Dye: Gift from bacteria. International Journal of Bioassays. 2016;5(9):4909-12. https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2016.12.0013
  12. Panigrahi GK, Sahoo AS, Panda S. A complex network of molecular events triggered upon environmental cues which decide the fate of gene expression: a review. International Journal of Bioassays. 2016;5(12):5185-91. https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2016.12.0013
  13. Tsuda K, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F. The interplay between MAMP and SA signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3(6):359-61. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.6.5702
  14. Tsuda K, Sato M, Stoddard T, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F. Network properties of robust immunity in plants. PLOS Genetics. 2009;5(12):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000772
  15. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 2006;124(4):803-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008
  16. Karasov TL, Chae E, Herman JJ, Bergelson J. Mechanisms to mitigate the trade-off between growth and defense. Plant Cell. 2017;29:666-80. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00931
  17. Li X, Clarke JD, Zhang Y, Dong X. Activation of an EDS1-mediated R-gene pathway in the snc1 mutant leads to constitutive, NPR1-independent pathogen resistance. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;114:1131-39. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1131
  18. Maekawa T, Kufer TA, Schulze-Lefert P. NLR functions in plant and animal immune systems: so far and yet so close. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:817-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2083
  19. Palma K, Thorgrimsen S, Malinovsky FG, Fiil BK, Nielsen HB, Brodersen P, Hofius D, Petersen M, Mundy J. Autoimmunity in Arabidopsis acd11 is mediated by epigenetic regulation of an immune receptor. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/c70c3fcc-01df-4f98-aa4f-19697ccf7cfa
  20. Shirano Y, Kachroo P, Shah J, Klessig DF. A gain of function mutation in an Arabidopsis Toll Interleukin1 receptor nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat type R gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance. Plant Cell. 2002;l14:3149-62. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.005348
  21. Halter T, Navarro L. Multilayer and interconnected post-transcriptional and co-transcriptional control of plant NLRs. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;26:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.06.014
  22. Lai Y, Eulgem T. Transcript-level expression control of plant NLR genes. Mol Plant Pathol. 2017;19:1267-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12607
  23. Panigrahi GK, Satapathy KB. Arabidopsis DCP5, a decapping complex protein interacts with Ubiquitin-5 in the processing bodies. Plant Archives. 2020;20(1)2243-47.
  24. Panigrahi GK, Satapathy KB. Formation of Arabidopsis Poly(A)-Specific Ribonuclease associated processing bodies in response to pathogenic infection. Plant Archives. 2020;20(2):4907-12.
  25. Panigrahi GK, Sahoo SK, Sahoo A, Behera S, Sahu S, Dash A, Satapathy KB. Bioactive molecules from plants: a prospective approach to combat SARS-CoV-2. ADV TRADIT MED (ADTM). 2021;1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-021-00599-y
  26. Sahoo SK, Panigrahi GK, Sahoo A, Pradhan AK, Dalbehera A. Bio-hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO–ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles using Psidium guajava leaf extract: Role in waste water remediation and plant immunity. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 128522: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128522

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.