Ecology, distribution mapping and population structure of Trichopus zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus (Arogyapacha)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3414Keywords:
biosphere reserve, ecological niche, ethnomedicinal, habitat fragmentation, patchy occurrence, spatial distributionAbstract
Trichopus zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus (Bedd.) Burkill ex K. Narayanan (Arogyapacha) is an ethnomedically important perennial herb with a restricted distribution in the southern Western Ghats, India. Habitat specifications reveal that suitable areas for this species occur at elevations ranging from 100 to 1000 m above sea level. A study was conducted to gain insights into the ecology, distribution mapping and population structure of T. zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus in the Western Ghats. The spatial distribution of this endemic species showed significant variations among populations. Seven populations were identified, exhibiting large and small distributional patches, even within a single population. Anthropogenic activities and climate-related shifts in ecophysiology have impacted seed dispersal, canopy gap formation and seedling mortality, altering vegetation composition. Observations indicated a disturbed ecological niche, fragmented habitat and patchy occurrence of this species. The vegetation data for T. zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus showed significant variations among the seven populations. The Kulathupuzha population exhibited higher recruitment rates and density than others. Canopy cover analysis revealed that populations with closed canopies influenced seedling recruitment and density. However, populations with moderately closed canopies displayed variable characteristics, with Kulathupuzha standing out for its higher recruitment rate and reproductive capacity.
Downloads
References
Sahni KC. Himalayan flora and physiography- a study in contrasts. In: Paliwal GS, editor. Vegetational wealth of the Himalayas. Delhi: Puja Publishers; 1984. p. 194?200.
Hajra PK, Rao RR. Distribution of vegetation types in northwest Himalaya with brief remarks on phytogeography and floral resource conservation. Proceed Ind Acad Sci (Plant Sciences); 1990. 100:263?77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053480
Dar GH, Khuroo AA, Nasreen A. Endemism in the angiosperm flora of Kashmir Valley, India: Stocktaking. In Mukherjee SK, Maiti GG editors. Proceedings of International Seminar on Multidisciplinary Approaches in Angiosperm Systematics; 2012 Sept 12; Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Kalyani: University of Kaywani; 2012.
IPCC, 2013: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, et al., editors. The physical science basis. Contribution of working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2013. p. 1–1535.
Willis KJ, Bhagwat SA. Biodiversity and climate change. Sci. 2009;6;326(5954):806–07. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1178838
Pushpangadan P, Rajasekharan S, Ratheshkumar PK, Jawahar CR, Nair VV, Lakshmi N, Amma LS. Arogyappacha(Trichopus zeylanicus Gaerin), The Ginsengof Kani Tribes of Agashyar Hills (Kerala) for evergreen health and vitality. An Sci Life. 1988;8(1):13–26.
George V, Ijinu TP, Chithra MA, Pushpangadan P. Can local health traditions and tribal medicines strengthen Ayurveda? Case study 2–Trichopus zeylanicus ssp. travancoricus Burkill ex Narayanan. J Trad Folk Prac. 2016;04(2):1–14.
Sivarajan VV, Pushpangadan P, Kumar PR. A revision of Trichopus (Trichopodaceae). Kew Bull. 1990;1:353–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/4115696
Cottam G, Curtis JT. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecol. 1956;37(3):451–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167
Saxena AK, Singh JS. A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetation. 1982;50(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120674
Lu D, Mausel P, Brondzio E, Moran E. Relationships between forest stand parameters and Landsat TM spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. For Ecol Manage. 2004;198(1–3):149–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.048
Crawley MJ. The population dynamics of plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biol Sci. 1990;330(1257):125–40. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0187
Sanczuk P, De Pauw K, De Lombaerde E, Luoto M, Meeussen C, Govaert S, et al. Microclimate and forest density drive plant population dynamics under climate change. Nat Clim Change. 2023;13(8):840–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01744-y
Stumpf KA. The estimation of forest vegetation cover descriptions using a vertical densitometer [internet]. Indianapolis: Joint inventory and biometrics working groups session at the SAF National Convention, 1993 [cited 2024 Sept 18]. Available from: https://www.grsgis.com/publications/saf_93.pdf
Baul TK, Peuly TA, Nandi R, Kar S, Mohiuddin M. Composition of homestead forests and their contribution to local livelihoods and environment: a study focused on Bandarban hill district, Bangladesh. Trees For People. 2021;5:100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100117
Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. Mortality and growth of a commercial hardwood el cativo, Prioriacopaifera, in Panama. Forest Ecol Manage. 1993;62(1-4):107–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(93)90045-O
Gomez-Zambrano Á, Crevillén P, Franco-Zorrilla JM, López JA, Moreno-Romero J, Roszak P, et al. Arabidopsis SWC4 binds DNA and recruits the SWR1 complex to modulate histone H2A. Z deposition at key regulatory genes. Mol Pl. 2218;11(6):815–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.014
Quilchano C, Marañón T, Pérez-Ramos IM, Noejovich L, Valladares F, Zavala MA. Patterns and ecological consequences of abiotic heterogeneity in managed cork oak forests of Southern Spain. Ecol Res. 2008;23:127–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0343-6
Penuelas J, Poulter B, Sardans J, Ciais P, Velde VDM, Bopp L, et al. Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat Comm. 2013;4(1):2934. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3934
Pauchard A, Villarroel P. Protected areas in Chile: history, current status and challenges. Nat Areas J. 2002;22(4):318–30.
Spear D, Foxcroft LC, Bezuidenhout H, McGeoch MA. Human population density explains alien species richness in protected areas. Biol Conserv. 2013;159:137–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.022
Tang L, Wolf AA, Gao Y, Wang CH. Photosynthetic tolerance to non?resource stress influences competition importance and intensity in an invaded estuary. Ecol. 2018;99(6):1327–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2214
Angala M, Anto M, Anilkumar C. Relevance of agroecology with the respect of ex-situ conservation of Trichopus zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus. In: Vilash V, Nadarajan R, Latha S, editors. Biodiversity challenges and threats; Current scenario. Kollam: SN College; 2023. p. 172–83.
Brown JH. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat. 1984;124(2):255–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/284267
Brown JH. Macroecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press;1995
Alvarez-Buylla ER. Density dependence and patch dynamics in tropical rain forests: matrix models and applications to a tree species. Am Nat. 1994;143(1):155–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/285599
Colling GUY, Matthies D. Effects of habitat deterioration on population dynamics and extinction risk of an endangered, long-lived perennial herb (Scorzonera humilis). J Ecol. 2006; 959–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01147.x
Smith M, Caswell H, Mettler-Cherry P. Stochastic flood and precipitation regimes and the population dynamics of a threatened floodplain plant. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(3):1036–52. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0434
Pascarella JB, Horvitz CC. Hurricane disturbance and the population dynamics of a tropical understory shrub: megamatrix elasticity analysis. Ecol. 1998;79(2):547–63. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0547:hdatpd]2.0.co;2
Caswell H, Kaye TN. Stochastic demography and conservation of an endangered perennial plant (Lomatium bradshawii) in a dynamic fire regime. Adv Ecol Res. 2001;32:1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(01)32010-X
Halpern SL, Underwood N. Approaches for testing herbivore effects on plant population dynamics. J App Ecol. 2006;43(5):922–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01220.x
Fikadu T, Zewdu T. Influences of tree species and canopy cover on aboveground biomass yield and ground cover of herbaceous plants in Eastern Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(4):233–40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.20
Nath PC, Arunachalam A, Khan ML, Arunachalam K, Barbhuiya AR. Vegetation analysis and tree population structure of tropical wet evergreen forests in and around Namdapha National Park, northeast India. Biodiver Conserv. 2005;14:2109–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-4361-1
Kolb A, Ehrlen J, Eriksson O. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal variation in pre-dispersal seed predation. Persp Pl Ecol Evol Syst. 2007;9(2):79–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.001
Maron JL, Crone E. Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proceed Royal Soc B: Biol Sci. 2006;273:2575–84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3587
Arya N, Ram J. Influence of canopy cover on vegetation in P. roxburghii Sarg (chir-pine) dominated forests in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Int J Bioassays. 2016;5:4617–20. https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2016.06.006
Aussenac G. Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Ann Forest Sci. 2000;57(3):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2000119
Kursar TA, Coley PD. Contrasting modes of light acclimation in two species of the rainforest understory. Oecologia. 1999;121:489–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050955
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-04-2025 (2)
- 24-02-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angala Mathew, Anto Mathew, Anilkumar Chandran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
