Impact of open and distance learning on agricultural education: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7505Keywords:
bibliometric analysis, distance learning, educational impact, research trends, technology integrationAbstract
Open and distance learning (ODL) plays a crucial role in agricultural education due to its potential to transform knowledge dissemination. It enhances agricultural productivity and addresses educational accessibility challenges. This study employs systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis to examine the evolution and impact of ODL in agricultural education. A total of 759 relevant studies were identified from the Web of Science database and analysed using VOS viewer and R Studio to map research trends and thematic clusters. The selection process was systematically documented following the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The analysis highlights the growing scholarly interest in this field, with significant research output emerging between 2020 and 2024 and peaking at 90 articles in 2022. The bibliometric analysis reveals diverse authorship with 3789 contributors and a strong collaborative focus, as evidenced by a 36.76 % international co authorship rate. The thematic analysis underscores four major clusters focusing on the impact of COVID-19, training and technology integration, educational frameworks and curriculum design. Geographical contexts indicate varied implementation across regions, with countries such as the USA, the UK, Germany and Italy emerging as central nodes in research networks. Future research should explore low-tech solutions, assess long-term impacts, integrate emerging technologies and establish robust evaluation frameworks. The findings highlight ODL's vital role in creating an inclusive, knowledge driven agricultural sector aligning with global development goals.
Downloads
References
Mc Carthy U, Uysal I, Badia-Melis R, Mercier S, O'Donnell C, Ktenioudaki A. Global food security–Issues, challenges and technological solutions. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2018; 77(1):11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.002
Finger R. Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2023;50(4):1277-309. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021
Ayim C, Kassahun A, Addison C, Tekinerdogan B. Adoption of ICT innovations in the agriculture sector in Africa: a review of the literature. Agriculture & Food Security. 2022;11(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00364-7
Takahashi K, Muraoka R, Otsuka K. Technology adoption, impact and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agricultural Economics. 2020;51(1):31-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539
Giller KE, Delaune T, Silva JV, Descheemaeker K, van de Ven G, Schut AG, et el. The future of farming: Who will produce our food? Food Security. 2021;13(5):1073-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01184-6
Amadi NS, Adejoh G. Strategies for re-orienting agricultural education towards hands on experience in Rivers State Universities. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 2020;5(3):64-73. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2020.5.3.0114
Jain PK, Hansra BS, Babu SC. Open and distance learning for capacity development of extension professionals. In Agricultural Extension Reforms in South Asia 2019; 275-85. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818752-4.00015-1
Abate GT, Abay KA, Chamberlin J, Kassim Y, Spielman DJ, Tabe-Ojong MP. Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet and what will it take to get there? Food Policy. 2023;116:102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102439
Ngoasong MZ. Curriculum adaptation for blended learning in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Management Education. 2022;46(4):622-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211047168
Paudi MH, Din R, Othman N. Agricultural Video as A Learning Medium for Young Farmer. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 2022;11(1):729-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i1/12142
Parikh T, Egendorf SP, Murray I, Jamali A, Yee B, Lin S, et al. Greening the virtual smart city: Accelerating peer-to-peer learning in urban agriculture with virtual reality environments. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 2022;3:815937. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.815937
Basche A, Krupek FS, Chatterjee N, Speth C. Farm simulation platforms increase undergraduate skills and confidence in decision?support technologies. Natural Sciences Education. 2021; 50(1):e20058. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20058
Olusoga OE. Prospect and challenges of agricultural education viz-a-viz attainment of millennium development goals by 2014. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2014;4(1):108-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n7p167
Ihuoma C. Achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 among Female Nomadic Children in Nigeria using Open and Distance Learning Strategies. In Tenth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, Edinburgh, Scotland. 2022. https://doi.org/10.56059/pcf10.5898
Chankseliani M, McCowan T. Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education. 2021;81(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w
Hernandez K, Flynn J, He J, Alsahi H. Towards digital inclusion in rural transformation. 2024. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9816en
Odularu G, Aluko OA, Odularu A, Akokuwebe M, Adedugbe A. Conclusion: Fostering nutrition security, climate adaptation and sustainable agriculture strategies amid COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrition, Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change in Africa: Issues and Innovative Strategies. 2020;175-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47875-9_12
Steinke J, Van Etten J, Müller A, Ortiz-Crespo B, van de Gevel J, Silvestri S, Priebe J. Tapping the full potential of the digital revolution for agricultural extension: an emerging innovation agenda. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2021;19(5-6):549-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1738754
Eyzaguirre IA, Fernandes ME. Combining methods to conduct a systematic review and propose a conceptual and theoretical framework in socio-environmental research. MethodsX. 2024;102484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102484
Dela Pena-Bandalaria M. Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a developing country setting: The Philippine experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2007;8(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.334
Guo J, Jin S, Chen L, Zhao J. Impacts of distance education on agricultural performance and household income: micro-evidence from peri-urban districts in beijing. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):3945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113945
Huda N. Open & distance learning (ODL) and agricultural extension workers’ social competence in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning. 2015;9(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i1.1004
Chu YJ. Constructing the Mode of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Food Science of Agriculture Research. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;8(12):883-86. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.8.2724
Chumbley SB. The impact of a career and technology education program. SAGE Open. 2016;6(4):2158244016678036. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016678036
Ramlee N, Rosli MS, Saleh NS. Mathematical HOTS cultivation via online learning environment and 5E inquiry model: Cognitive impact and the learning activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online). 2019; 14(24):140. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12071
Liu Q, Chen H, Crabbe M. Interactive study of multimedia and virtual technology in art education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in learning (iJET). 2021;16(1):80-93. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218648/
Abdullateef S, Parkinson T, Sarmini I. Cross border connected learning in northern Syria: An agricultural pilot study. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2020;1:100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100005
Ivens S, Wiese G, Dittert K, Mußhoff O, Oberle M. Bringing policy decisions to the people-education for sustainable development through a digital simulation game. Sustainability. 2020;12(20):8743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208743
Gennari P, Bizier V, Petracchi C, Navarro DK. New needs and training modalities for the sustainable transfer of know-how on food and agriculture statistics in the COVID-19 era. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2021;37(3):977-95. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-210853
Jiang S, Pu R. Reconceptualizing and modeling sustainable consumption behavior: A synthesis of qualitative evidence from online education industry. Innovative Marketing. 2021;17(3):144. http://doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.12
Aviv-Reuven S, Rosenfeld A. Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2021;6(8):6761-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04059-x
Alenizi MA. The impact of training for IoT technology awareness program In the Saudi Arabian Universities. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation. 2022;(17):45-58. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4914
Bai L, Yang B, Yuan S. Evaluating of Education Effects of Online Learning for Local University Students in China: A Case Study. Sustainability. 2023;15(13):9860. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139860
Krishnasamy S, Smith MR, Narayan E, Aziz AA, Hoffman EW. Developing virtual field trips for Agriculture. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 2023;31(3). https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.31.03.001
Grunfeld H, Ng ML. A multimedia approach to ODL for agricultural training in Cambodia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2013;14(1):222-38. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1275
Fiedler ST, Heyne T, Bogner FX. Closing the gap: potentials of ESE distance teaching. Sustainability. 2022;14(14):8330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148330
Ninh LK. Economic role of education in agriculture: Evidence from rural Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development. 2021;23(1):47-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-05-2020-0052
Boakye LG, Osei CK, Annor SY. On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism? Cogent Social Sciences. 2021;7(1):1865609. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1865609
Amponsah EK, Aboagye E, Agyemang OS. Crop technology adoption among rural farmers in some selected regions of Mali. Journal of sustainable development. 2013; 6(10):25. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v6n10p25
Nakano Y, Tsusaka TW, Aida T, Pede VO. Is farmer-to-farmer extension effective? The impact of training on technology adoption and rice farming productivity in Tanzania. World Development. 2018;105:336-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.013
Rohit J, Singh P, Chahal VP, Satyapriya S. Skill Gap Analysis of Extensionists working in Krishi Vigyan Kendras in India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020;90(2):268-72. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i2.98999
Thomas E, Riley M, Spees J. Knowledge flows: Farmers’ social relations and knowledge sharing practices in ‘Catchment Sensitive Farming’. Land use policy. 2020;90:104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104254
N. Kingiri A. Agricultural advisory and extension service approaches and inclusion in reaching out to Kenyan rural farmers. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2021;13(7):797-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1823098
Mhishi M, Bhukuvhani CE, Sana AF. Science teacher training programme in rural schools: An ODL lesson from Zimbabwe. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2012;13(1):72-86. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1058
Mswazie J, Blignaut S. Developing teacher competencies through the open and distance learning approach in Zimbabwe. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2019;33(3):65-80. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-3-3378
Amankwah A. Climate variability, agricultural technologies adoption and productivity in rural Nigeria: a plot-level analysis. Agriculture & Food Security. 2023;12(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00411-x
Hitayezu P, Okello JJ, Obel-Gor C. Farm households' participation in rural non-farm employment in post-war Rwanda: Drivers and policy implications. Development Southern Africa. 2014;31(3):452-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2014.889560
Ilonga A, Ashipala DO, Tomas N. Challenges experienced by students studying through open and distance learning at a higher education institution in Namibia: Implications for strategic planning. International Journal of Higher Education. 2020;9(4):116-27. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p116
Anderson T, Dron J. Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2011;12(3):80-97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Salooja MK, Vijayakumar P. Role of Open and Distance Learning in Agriculture Education in India. In Optimizing Open and Distance Learning in Higher Education Institutions 2018. 244-56. IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-5225-2624-7.ch011
Abdon BR, Raab RT. Knowledge sharing and distance learning for sustainable agriculture in the Asia-Pacific region: The role of the internet. Plant Prod Sci. 2005;8(3):298-307. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.298
Cruz LN, Caringal Jr MS, Inocencio Jr EB. Widening access to organic agriculture through open and distance e-Learning. Journal of Management and Development Studies. 2014;3(1):39-49. https://jmds.upou.edu.ph/index.php/journal/article/view/5
Uma G, Sinhamahapatra M. Analyzing needs for open and distance learning programme in gender, agriculture and sustainable development. Indian Journal of Open Learning. 2013;22(3):199-212.
Gaskell A, Mills R. The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: what are the challenges? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 2014;29(3):190-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.993603

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gnanasanjevi G, Balasubramaniam P, Sriram N, Lakshmi S, Gangai Selvi R, Suresh J

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).